Is the IMF wrong on banks?

Christine St Anne  |  22/11/2012Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Christine St Anne: The International Monetary Fund, or IMF, has recently called for greater controls on Australian Banks. Today I'm joined by Morningstar's David Ellis to discuss whether the IMF's concerns are justified. David welcome.

David Ellis: It's a pleasure, Christine.

St Anne: David, the IMF has called for banks to hold more capital. What is your view?

Ellis: Christine, I've got a very strong view and I think the IMF is wrong. I don't think the Australian Banks necessarily need to hold more capital for the reasons outlined by the IMF. Over the last three or four years, the four major Australian banks have increased their capital level significantly for a number of reasons, but the most important was getting over the global financial crisis particularly in 2008 and then in 2009.

The capital levels now are about 1.5 times higher than they were going into the GFC. The new capital global capital rules, applied from the 1st of January 2013, these are far stricter rules and the four major Australian banks have already exceeded the new minimum requirements and the bank regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), has required the four major Australian banks to be fully compliant on the 1 January 2013 rather than a staged process or a staged period running out for three or four years.

St Anne: David, do you think that banks should implement greater stress testing as suggested by the IMF?

Ellis: Well, the banks always, have always and continue to undertake stress tests. They have done this in conjunction with Australian Regulator, APRA, and they have the details of the testing as confidential, however, I would estimate that the stress testing has become tougher and tougher and more robust. So by itself I don't see a need to say that stress testing needs to be done by the Australian banks. They have always done stress testing. They will always continue to stress test their business models.

Of course, there is good reason to continue to make it tougher, this stress testing. So I don't disagree with the need to continue, but it's not something new. They've always done it. APRA is heavily involved in that process. I think it's an evolving concept that they will continue to do more sophisticated stress testing and that ultimately leads to better and stronger banks.

St Anne: The IMF has also suggested that banks share the cost of the government’s guarantee. Is that justified?

Ellis: Well, that's a tough one. I struggle with that. I think in the end, unfortunately, the consumer will pay, no matter whether the government forces a fee or a charge on to the Australia banks for providing the deposits or guarantee. If the Australian government does go down that path and does raise it, a fee, I would imagine that the banks would pass it through to consumers one way or the other. It may not be a specific standalone charge or fee, but the banks will recoup it from their consumers.
St Anne: Finally, David, do you think that the banks are well placed if we do have another market crisis?

Ellis: Well, the four major banks have never been in a stronger position. Never been in a stronger position. As I mentioned earlier, the capital levels are 50 per cent higher than they were pre-GFC. The funding and liquidity levels are significantly higher. The reliance on short-term wholesale funding has decreased.

Wholesale funding has become longer maturity term in wholesale funding. The proportion of customer deposits to total funding has increased. It's running now between 50 per cent and 60 per cent. So capital levels are higher. So obviously, there is no guarantee we won't have another global financial crisis, but the Australian banks are in a far stronger position. We say with increasing confidence and increasing certainty that the Australian banks, the four major banks will actually have a surplus of capital in maybe 12 to 18 months' time, and we believe that the four major banks will be returning surplus capital to shareholders in 12 to 18 months’ time, which is far, far, far different to the IMF’s position that the Australian banks need additional capitals also.

St Anne: David thanks so much for your insights today.

Ellis: It's a pleasure Christine.  

Video Archive...

Don’t overdo benchmark consideration
27/06/2017  --
Factor-based investing using ETFs
26/06/2017  Investors should consider style-exposures--such as value, defensive or yield-- they would like in their portfolios, explains Jonathan Shead, head of portfolio strategists – Asia Pacific, State Street Global Advisors
Volatility plays to active manager strengths
--  The climate of political volatility in the US holds important implications for investors and the funds they invest in, particularly around Donald Trump's ability to pass legislation through Congress, says Pimco's Libby Cantrill.
Is the FTSE 100 Facing Another Market Crash?
16/06/2017  Ten years on from the pre-crisis FTSE 100 high, Morningstar UK's Emma Wall examines how UK stocks have fared
How to guard against retirement threats
16/06/2017  As retirement approaches, even the best-laid plans can go awry, as Tim Steffen tells Christine Benz, Morningstar US.
PIMCO Global Credit Fund
07/06/2017  The PIMCO Global Credit strategy receives a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Silver due to its sizeable and highly capable credit research team.
PIMCO Income Fund
07/06/2017  Morningstar's Tim Wong looks at the strengths and competitive advantages of this Silver-rated strategy.
3 pockets of opportunity in fixed income
07/06/2017  The head of PIMCO Australia portfolio management explains his views on active management in fixed income and outlines where he sees most value in this space.
Trump administration biggest macro threat for investors
05/06/2017  Even as European political volatility subsides, the US Government remains a considerable threat to financial markets, says Colleen Barbeau, director of equity portfolio management, Franklin Templeton.
Antipodes Global Fund: Class P
01/06/2017  Antipodes constructs this portfolio based on three major objectives--capital preservation, inclusion of attractively priced businesses, and investment resilience.
Investors Mutual WS Future Leaders Fund
01/06/2017  Investors Mutual Future Leaders is a capable strategy focused on investing in Australian companies outside the top 50.
Why the time is right to invest in India
25/05/2017  Indian stocks rallied after the appointment of Narendra Modi as Prime Minister--but then subsequently fell. UK-based investment manager Jonathan Schiessl says now is the time to buy.
When should you pay active fund fees?
23/05/2017  When is it worth paying higher fund fees for active fund management? The single most important factor effecting a fund's relative performance is its price.
Budget 2017: bank levy a potential 4pc hit to big five profits, dividends
10/05/2017  If unable to pass on costs associated with the new levy proposed in the Budget, bank profits and dividends could dive 4 to 5 per cent, in a significant hit to shareholders and customers.
Why PIMCO Australian Bond is a Gold-rated strategy
10/05/2017  Tim Wong explains why PIMCO Australian Bond is Morningstar's most highly rated fixed-interest strategy in this market.
2 leisure stocks weather Cyclone Debbie, Dreamworld fallout
02/05/2017  These two companies with large theme park operations have faced significant challenges in recent times. Morningstar senior equity analyst Brian Han explains how they've fared.
Schroders stays hot on commodities, cooler on tech and defensives
01/05/2017  Long-term investors in Australian shares will continue to find value, but the time for risk-taking on more speculative plays has passed, says Martin Conlon, Schroders’ head of Australian equities
Introducing star ratings to Morningstar Australasia equity research
27/04/2017  What investors can expect from Morningstar's roll-out of its star rating methodology across Australian and New Zealand stocks, as explained by the regional director of equity research, Adam Fleck.
French elections: Macron versus Le Pen
26/04/2017  Following the first round of the French Presidential elections, the 7 May vote is now between Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen. What does it mean for investors?
How climate change will impact your portfolio
20/04/2017  Ignore climate change at your portfolio's peril, says Jeremy Grantham, founder of asset manager GMO.