Stocks Special Reports LICs Hybrids Technical Analysis Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Learn
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features Hybrids Technical Analysis SMSFs Learn Fund Times Ask the Analyst China Wrap
About

News

2013 could hold some silver linings

Trevor Greetham  |  29 Jan 2013Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  

Page 1 of 2

Trevor Greetham is the asset allocation director at Fidelity Worldwide Investment, a global asset manager.

 

Global stock indices posted double-digit returns in 2012 as Hong Kong and Germany performed best, while Japan and Spain lagged. Bond markets offered steady returns as emerging-market debt, high-yield and Italian government bonds performed strongly at the riskier end of the spectrum.

But solid full-year returns tell only half the story of what was another roller-coaster year. Stock markets rose, fell, then rose again as policy makers responded to euro stress and weak economic data in the middle of the year. Risk on/risk off will still be with us in 2013, but we are upbeat on the world economy and we expect the trend to favour US and emerging-market stocks.

Four years on from the failure of Lehman Brothers and the investment backdrop is still one characterised by economic uncertainty, short business cycles, knee-jerk policy interventions and, as a result of the knee-jerk reactions, a polarisation of asset returns that is reducing much of active management to a binary call on risk.

The onset of the global financial crisis can be traced back to the 2006 peak in US home prices, but it was the shock caused by the failure of Lehman in September 2008 that gave rise to the risk-on/risk-off phenomenon. Almost overnight, a wide range of risky assets moved decisively lower and they have moved almost in lockstep ever since.

At the same time, safe government bonds have moved the other way. We see this behaviour as a consequence of heightened economic uncertainty. Sensitivity to violent swings in global growth is drowning out other factors. We expect correlations to stay polarised for years to come, given the indebtedness of major economies and political tensions in the eurozone periphery.

 

A multi-asset silver lining

While risk on/risk off makes active management more challenging than usual, there is a silver lining for multi-asset investors. Low or negative short-term correlations between risky assets and haven investments are improving the diversification benefits to be had from mixed exposure and the four years since the crisis lows have seen good returns for investments of all kinds.

Global stock prices have almost doubled since March 2009 and total-return indices in the US, UK, Germany and some emerging markets are at, or are near, record highs. Bond markets have fared well, especially those with exposure to credit risk. Gold seems to have had it both ways - at times a risk asset, at times a haven - rising 250 per cent since 2006 as central banks started expanding their balance sheets.

As uncorrelated short-term trades are harder to find, it is all the more important to express longer-term views alongside those of a more tactical nature. There are important divergences to exploit. With the world economy seriously desynchronised for the first time in 20 years, there is a wide dispersion of regional equity returns. US stocks have outperformed eurozone stocks by around 50 per cent since the middle of 2007 and policy differences still lead us to favour the US.

Different economies were hit to differing degrees by the financial crisis and policymakers have chosen different policy mixes in response, not all good. Lessons from the 1930s' depression suggest countries able to foster recovery with sustained easy monetary and fiscal policies stand the best chance of growing their way out of debt.

On this basis, the US looks best-placed to emerge from its downturn first. Meanwhile, the global financial crisis was just the kind of asymmetric shock 1990s' euro project naysayers warned of and the rigidities of the single currency have been laid bare.

Policy differences matter. A recent International Monetary Fund study concluded that fiscal tightening during a period of economic weakness can be counterproductive. The "fiscal cliff" in the US is a negotiating tactic whereas in parts of Europe aggressive front-loaded austerity has been a reality. The US will tighten fiscal policy in 2013 but gradually and into a recovery where economic activity is already well above its 2007 level.

US property prices are rising, banks are willing to lend and unemployment is falling. In the eurozone, fiscal tightening has been concentrated in the periphery where asset prices are falling, banking systems are fragile and unemployment is hitting record highs.

Even in the UK, where US-style quantitative easing has been in force, the economy has failed to muster enough momentum to mount a sustainable recovery. The quantitative easings by the central Bank of England have not offset the withdrawal of fiscal stimulus in the way interest-rate cuts did in the early 1980s.