Page 1 of 1
Schroders' Simon Doyle illustrates how the dangers associated with social media feeds are exactly like those faced by many investors.
While I'm a bit "old school" (I still tuck my shirts in), I do have Facebook and Instagram accounts and recently started a Twitter account--not to tweet myself--but given others do, I want to know what the fuss is about.
To be clear I'm not following Donald Trump and am unlikely to ever do so. The danger with all these social media feeds is threefold.
The first is the risk of information overload (too much information to properly process), the second is the risk of too much meaningless information (I don't really care what someone's dinner looked like), and thirdly the risk of misinformation (stuff that is just simply untrue, potentially misleading, and often just rubbish).
These are exactly the same problems many investors face--there's too much information (including via the new media formats) that properly processing and drawing meaningful conclusions is pretty difficult, if not damn near impossible, and a lot of it is irrelevant.
Unless you have a framework to process information and a set of beliefs that underpin this framework then you'll likely drown in a mire of data and noise--the colour and movement that comes with the instantaneous "analysis" of news, tweets and "alternative facts".
This is particularly relevant in the current context given the torrent of noise around the global economy and markets--Fed policy, Trump and his "policies," the European election cycle ... the list goes on. It does get tiring just thinking about it.
The reason I make this observation is the fact that it's relevant to understanding what's driving markets. For all the noise, the simple reality is that there are only really a few things that matter in terms of explaining where markets are today and, more importantly, giving us any real insight into where they are going.
From an economic perspective, the two things that matter are growth and inflation. Economic indicators such as ISM Manufacturing Index, non-farm payrolls, retail sales, et cetera, simply help inform us about growth and inflation.
Growth and inflation are important because they tell us something about corporate profits and the likely direction of policy.
If we take the current US economic situation, then the flow of data suggests decent growth (maybe on trend or above) and moderate but rising inflation.
The growth/inflation mix also suggests that while monetary policy may need to edge tighter, it also suggests no inherent rush to take policy to a restrictive stance to materially slow the economy to effectively dampen future inflation.
From a cyclical perspective, this is a good environment for equities and the most likely reason why equities are rallying.
Sure, Trump's promises to cut corporate tax rates and reduce red tape might be helping, but arguably they're simply reinforcing an underlying trend. The economic story though is only half the story.
Above, I mentioned the need for beliefs and an investment process that aligns with those beliefs. From our perspective, a key philosophical belief is that valuations matter. There will come a point where the economic story--good, bad, or indifferent, is in the price, and more likely, has been over-discounted.
Our process compresses these factors into return forecasts which give us some idea as to the returns we can expect from key assets over the next three years, based on current valuations--the more stretched the asset, the lower the prospective returns are likely to be.
So where does this framework leave us today?
Firstly, with profit margins already relatively high, rising equity prices are simply reducing future returns. Our US equity market forecasts are now below 3 per cent per annum (based on a rolling three-year ahead forecast).
While the US has been the main beneficiary of the "Trump" linked rally, other developed markets have been dragged along, pulling down future returns across the board.
Our framework suggests mid-single-digit returns from the major developed equity markets over this same timeframe. Australia looks a little better (given high yields and better cyclical valuations) but will nonetheless likely deliver below-trend returns to investors.
Secondly, credit markets have also embraced the constructive cyclical backdrop and this has been reflected in a sharp narrowing of credit spreads.
While there is some, albeit limited scope for further narrowing, there is significant scope for spreads to widen. In return terms, this means (at best) low returns and (at worst) poor returns as spreads revert to more sustainable, through-the-cycle norms.
The difference between credit and equity is that even if corporate profits grow strongly, the benefits will flow through to the equity holders with limited benefit to the debt holders--particularly now with spreads so narrow. At the margin, we prefer equities to debt.
Thirdly, fixed-income investors have seen bond yields rise but the extent of the rise has been modest when considered against the backdrop of the multi-decade bull market in bonds that propelled yields to exceptionally low (and in some cases negative) yields.
The modest back-up in yields (most evident in the US) has improved prospective returns but the outright numbers remain low with further repricing likely before bonds become interesting again from our perspective.
In isolation, this looks like a fairly bare cupboard. Clearly based on current market levels and broader valuations for key assets, simply owning broad market beta in a set-and-forget approach will likely come up short against our targets. This is our version of the reality of markets today.
That said, we are still confident that our objective of 5 per cent per annum above inflation is a realistic and achievable objective. Achieving it though won't be easy (given the starting point for markets) and will require us to focus on two things:
1) We will need to actively manage our market exposures. While our return forecasts are generally modest they won't be linear and the distribution around them--read margin for error--will be high. We will need to actively manage our exposures to ensure we are capturing opportunities when they do present and avoid holding assets that will lead to losses, dragging down returns and making the achievement of our goals more difficult.
2) We will also look to exploit opportunities "one level down". What I mean by this is that while broad market returns may look constrained, there are clearly opportunities at a sector and cross market level that can be exploited to contribute positive returns to the portfolio. Examples include the mispricing of A-REITs versus the broader market, the impact of rising inflation on inflation-linked securities versus nominal bonds and the potential for some significant moves in currencies as economies and markets realign. This, together with the contribution from active stock selection, will be an important fillip for the modest underlying contribution from relatively expensive broader markets.
Consistent with this, we made several changes to the portfolio in February. We took profits on the long resources versus the broader equity market position following strong performance from resources in recent months. This was part of a series of positions that we'd put in place to capture the broader reflation theme.
The second key change was to take further profits on the long global high-yield credit position we established around 12 months ago when spreads were significantly wider, and having seen spreads compress materially (as outlined above), future returns will be modest with risks increasingly skewed to the downside.
In aggregate we are defensively positioned. Our cash holdings are clearly elevated relative to what we would expect to hold over the longer term.
This reflects our broader views on the lack of adequate risk premium across a broad spectrum of assets and leaves us well positioned to both benefit from any market repricing and implement the sorts of positions described above to help us achieve our objectives.
More from Morningstar
Simon Doyle is head of fixed income & multi-asset at Schroders. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.
© 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.