Low volatility a mirage
Page 1 of 1
Schroders head of fixed income and multi-asset Simon Doyle says investors need to remember that low volatility doesn't mean low risk.
September was a mixed month in financial markets. While it began poorly for many assets, the second half saw many of these trends reverse.
The initial weakness was largely due to sentiment that monetary stimulus is reaching the limits of its effectiveness and the policy mix (at the margin anyway) could change.
Such thinking, however, dissipated after softer US data gave the Federal Reserve another reason to balk at raising the US cash rate. While bond yields rose early in the month, much of this was reversed.
While the Australian equity market edged higher in aggregate, significantly, sectoral divergence emerged. Materials posted solid gains (+5.6 per cent) while REITs, telecoms and utilities recorded declines (-4.3 per cent, -4.0 per cent and -3.6 per cent, respectively).
The vulnerability of the "bond-sensitive" sectors has been a dominant theme for us for some time (particularly against the relative cheapness of commodity producers). Being positioned for this shift contributed to performance in September.
Notwithstanding the comments above about market performance in September, volatility in financial markets remains low. A naïve assessment would be that risks are also low.
After all, relatively narrow credit spreads and moderate prospective returns from equities would seem consistent with this, no?
A more objective assessment, though, would likely conclude that this is not the case. As the recent poor performance of REITs would highlight, if the crutch of central-bank largesse wobbles, significant repricing is likely.
Owning risky assets because the alternative offers effectively nothing while assuming unwavering central-bank support is not necessarily a sustainable long-term investment strategy. A low return on cash is better than a negative return from bonds.
In an environment where risks seem skewed to the downside, it may not take much to cause investors to rethink.
Low returns at least imply capital preservation (at a minimum) and the liquidity to take advantage of opportunities. This optionality is not without value even if in the short run there might be an opportunity cost.
The list of reassessment triggers is long--and history suggests that in all likelihood the trigger is not even on the list. European banks (Deutsche Bank is currently prominent), a Trump presidency (not the base case but neither was Brexit), the Chinese debt bubble or a pick-up in US inflation each have the potential to shake investors from their complacency.
Focussing on triggers, though, while an interesting exercise, is in many ways pointless. The key issue is whether or not the preconditions exist. On this point asset prices are vulnerable.
A disconnection exists between the pricing of risk and the inherent riskiness of asset classes. At the heart of the issue are sovereign yields, which have been manipulated to satisfy policy goals, not to balance the demand and supply considerations of investors.
As this drives the discount rate applied to all financial (and non-financial) assets, prices have risen across the curve, not because the cash flows generated by these assets have improved (either in quantum or stability), but because they are being discounted by a lower number.
If yields stay low AND cash flows continue as assumed, then all is good. But if either of these assumptions is tested, watch out.
Secondly, low yields have distorted the behaviour of investors looking to increase income--after all, for most investors their income requirements haven't fallen with yields.
While typical of "late-cycle" investor behaviour, alternative investments have gathered favour. Alternatives are typically characterised by factors such as leverage, the absence of mark-to-market pricing and a lack of transparency in the underlying investments (and performance fees).
While their introduction may help smooth returns when markets are kind, they can compound the challenge faced by investors if markets conditions worsen. (The year 2008 is a good case study). Liquidity should not be undervalued.
We probably sound like a broken record on some of these issues but so be it. Timing, as always, is the difficult bit. Trying too hard to finesse this, though, can be just as problematic as not being positioned in the first place.
To this end, we have maintained a consistent position with respect to the growth-defensive split in the portfolio. Our equity exposure is about 28 per cent (but drops to 23 per cent if we adjust for the delta of a put option position should markets slump).
The flip side of this is a cash holding of about 26 per cent. During September, we introduced a small (2.5 per cent) exposure to an absolute-return emerging-market debt strategy, in part by trimming our high-yield credit exposure.
This should not be read as us turning bullish on emerging-market debt, but rather that we were looking to diversify some of our corporate exposure in a low-risk way. Overall, we remain cautious.
More from Morningstar
Simon Doyle is head of fixed income and multi-asset at Schroders. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind.
© 2016 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.