Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn
About

News

Putting the perspective into politics

Paras Anand  |  04 Apr 2017Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  

Page 1 of 1

Two distinct camps are emerging in the markets: one emphasising the uncertain political outlook and the other downplaying the political impact on the wider economy.

Paras Anand, Fidelity International's CIO equities, Europe, argues that the heightened sense of a political "black swan" event is overshadowing the important trends of a reduction in systemic risk since the GFC and the relentless onward march of technology.

 

Two political camps

When it comes to thinking about how the uncertain political environment will shape markets, two distinct camps are emerging.

One side believes the shifting political landscape will have consequences for the global economy, currencies, and asset prices that will dwarf all other considerations.

The other side believes that politics is a distracting backdrop which will only have negligible effects.

Currently, the latter camp appears to be two-nil up in the game following the hard-charging markets in the aftermath of Brexit and the US election.

I suggest that neither group is entirely right and perhaps investors should be watching a different match altogether.

Are we worrying too much about politics?

A case can be made that the powerful combination of non-stop news coverage and a genuine shift from ideology-based to national identity politics has led to outcomes previously thought remote.

These events have been widely painted as both significant and unusually influential for economic growth and the financial markets.

Those in the "distracting backdrop" camp, on the other hand, justify their view by citing the resilience of the economy, robust equity markets, checks and balances on disruptive government policy, and that the wheels of politics are slow to turn.

While those factors are generally true, there remains the real threat of complacency.

The first camp will also point out that while equity markets were surprisingly robust in the face of Brexit and the Trump election victories, sterling and bond markets were not, so it would be incorrect to say there were no financial market impacts of last year's events.

Additionally, they highlight that the extremely cautious market sentiment at the outset of 2016 when there were genuine fears of a global recession, conditioned markets to accept Brexit and Trump with a relative degree of equanimity.

This response has generated a false sense of security towards future shocks. In other words, they would argue that base level expectations have changed, setting up markets for a rude awakening if and when a political shock does strike.

As undecided market participants determine which of the above camps to join ahead of the upcoming high-stakes European elections, I would draw investors' attention to two factors that are being overlooked amid the political domination of the headlines: the reduction of systemic risk and technological progress.

Reduction in systemic risk

The market is yet to fully accept that the risk of systemic shock has reduced significantly since the GFC.

It could be argued there have been three major systemic risks since the GFC:

• Political contagion--specifically the spread of populism,

• Sentiment contagion--mainly the belief in stagnation,

• Economic contagion--the scope for a crisis in one economy to lead to demand destruction in others.

Of the three, the market has rightly been most concerned with economic contagion and this largely explains why top-down analysis has taken centre stage in recent years.

Real economic contagion spreads through the financial system by attacking points of vulnerability where the system is highly leveraged and tightly interconnected.

Over the past eight years, aggregate leverage and interconnections have declined, which ought to have put politics and macroeconomic events into more perspective.

There are many negative outcomes that investors fear, but constantly labelling events as black swans gives those outcomes an unwarranted status.

For example, in the potential event of Greece leaving the single currency in 2017 or 2018, it would be just as significant as if it happened in 2012, but crucially far less consequential for markets given the recovery in the European economy since then.

Technological progress

Whatever is happening in the wider political debate, technological development is both rapid and borderless and will have a greater impact on consumer tastes, wealth creation, and corporate success and failure than the vast majority of government policy.

It is notable that despite explicit rhetoric from the US government to shore up old economy sectors, the Nasdaq continues to post impressive returns.

Given this market signal, perhaps investors' most critical task over the coming years is to analyse to what extent technology will shift the corporate landscape, disrupt established value chains and/or open up new opportunities for leading franchises.

Conclusion

The good news is that while the political environment continues to enthral most market participants, there is the scope for politically-driven sentiment swings that can provide good long-term investment opportunities.

More from Morningstar

• Why this financial stock is one to watch

• Myth-busting: Stock valuation and earnings growth

• Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial

 

Paras Anand is chief investment officer, equities, Europe, at Fidelity International. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.

© 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.