A scary number looming over Australian stocks
Page 1 of 1
The unwinding of distortions on stock markets, magnified by central banks, threatens a record part of the ASX, according to Schroders' Martin Conlon.
Sydney Airport (ASX: SYD) surged 89 per cent over the past three calendar years. Toll-road operator Transurban (ASX: TCL) rallied 71 per cent over that time. Banks climbed 45 per cent, REITs charged ahead 55 per cent while utilities soared 51 per cent compared with a gain of 26 per cent for the ASX/S&P 200 Accumulation Index from 2012 to 2015.
These companies didn't become more efficient or announce anything masterfully strategic to deserve higher share prices. They mostly just benefitted from the way central banks have warped share markets with their promiscuous monetary policies.
The disfigurements on share markets swelled when central-bank asset buying on top of negative policy rates bludgeoned bond yields into unheard-of negative territory. Over the past 12 months, for example, yields on government bonds in Germany, Switzerland and Japan out to 10 years in maturity turned negative.
Australian 10-year government bond yields dropped to a record low 1.82 per cent on 2 August this year, swept along by this trend, low inflation and 12 rate cuts over the past five years by the Reserve Bank of Australia.
Investors, perhaps unwillingly but rationally, turned away from term deposits and low-yielding bonds and sought bond-like equities, those that offer stable long-term income streams just like fixed-income securities.
Stocks with sound fundamentals, but which lacked the tag of "yield play," were often overlooked as this macro-driven momentum distorted global share markets.
Citi Research estimates that macro factors explain between 70 per cent and 80 per cent of equity-market variance over the past three calendar years, up from an average of about 55 per cent over the previous five years.
But this rally in interest-rate-sensitive stocks could never last. The bubble would always expire when central banks refrained from more meddling and we may have reached this point. Bond yields are rising as policy makers, acknowledging that monetary policy has reached its limits, are turning to fiscal policy to prod economies.
Amid a rise in global bond yields, a 50-basis-point jump in Australian 10-year government bond yields since 31 August has savaged many yield-sensitive stocks.
The concern for stock investors, especially passive ones, is that bond-sensitive stocks form a record 60 per cent of the S&P/ASX 200 Index due to the financialisation of Australia's economy of recent decades, which has seen bank lending balloon from 85 per cent of GDP in 1991 to about 160 per cent of output now.
The unwinding of the distortions on stock markets magnified by central banks thus threatens a record part of the ASX.
Yield-plays, to be sure, assumed a greater proportion of the ASX before the global financial crisis so their pre-eminence is not all due to crazy monetary policies.
Bond yields could drop again if deflation re-emerges as a threat. That would postpone any reckoning for bond-sensitive stocks. Cyclical stocks, in theory, also come under pressure from higher interest rates.
However, having not participated in the gains from lower interest rates, it seems somewhat logical that they should be more insulated from increases. The worry for yield plays is that the rise in global bond yields looks entrenched.
Be prepared for turbulence if yields rise faster and by more than expected.
The rise of bond sensitives
One way to analyse the ASX is to split stocks into the three categories: bond sensitives, diversifiers and cyclicals.
Bond-sensitive stocks include financials, REITs, utilities, telcos thanks to their regulated and (often inflation-sheltered) income streams, infrastructure owners for the same reason and even healthcare companies due to investor belief they face endless revenue growth.
The cyclicals are material, energy and consumer discretionary stocks. Diversifiers include consumer staples and industrials, sectors that fall outside the other two categories.
Such a breakdown would show that in 1973, when Australia was a relatively closed and rigid economy, bond-sensitive stocks only comprised about 15 per cent of the benchmark (using the S&P/ASX 300 Index equivalent then as the proxy).
This percentage dropped to about 10 per cent during the recession of the early 1980s when credit growth slowed. It was only in the mid-1980s (when lending surged after the financial sector was deregulated and foreign banks were welcomed) that bond-sensitives reached 30 per cent of the index.
The victory over inflation in the early 1990s and the borrowing binge that followed boosted bond sensitives to more than 50 per cent of the S&P/ASX 300 by 1998, a level they hovered around until 2012, even allowing for gyrations around 2008.
Then came the emergency actions of central banks of recent years. Low interest rates have encouraged credit creation of 10 per cent to 20 per cent a year in recent times, lending sprees that have driven up prices on all assets including stocks but especially housing.
This policy-driven resources allocation (there is little wealth creation) propelled bond sensitives to that record 60 per cent of the ASX over the past year. (See chart below.)
Bond sensitives versus cyclicals as share of ASX since 1973
Source: Macquarie, IRESS. S&P/ASX 300 Index to 30 September 2016. Bond sensitives include utilities, telcos, IT, property, financials and healthcare. Cyclicals include energy, materials and consumer discretionaries. Diversifiers include consumer staples and industrials.
This ratio has dipped now that bond yields are rebounding. The peak of central bank meddling seems to have been reached earlier this year when superstar economists such as Larry Summers questioned the effectiveness of extreme monetary policy and instead advocated steps tied to fiscal policy.
Whatever the catalyst, the appetite for bond-like equities is waning now that interest rates are rising. The rebound in the Australian 10-year yields past 2.3 per cent pummelled Sydney Airport by 14 per cent and lopped 9.3 per cent off Transurban over the past two months.
During that time, REITs were slammed 12 per cent and utilities 6.2 per cent. The S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation shed only 1.7 per cent over September and October.
The unwinding of the bond-sensitive bubble is made even more precarious by the fact that management teams at many yield plays have made their company fundamentals more susceptible to a jump in interest rates.
Utilities, infrastructure stocks and REITs are more vulnerable because management used low interest rates to borrow heavily, sometimes to pay dividends. REITs' average gearing, for instance, is about 33 per cent now, which, while below the peak of about 40 per cent that proved dangerous in 2007, is up from 28 per cent three years ago.
REITs have also massaged accounts by adjusting depreciation ratios to boost earnings, a ploy that investors can overlook when momentum favours such stocks, but not now. Healthcare stocks are being punished because their growth profiles are exaggerated.
Higher interest rates shouldn't, in theory, hurt bank margins. The risk for banks is that higher interest rates might boost bad debt ratios. This is already happening to some extent--last fiscal year, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA) reported a 27 per cent jump in bad debts to a five-year high of $1.27 billion.
But bad debts are still low, as major bank impaired assets only stood at 0.4 per cent of total loans in fiscal 2016. To put any rise in that ratio in perspective, every 25-basis-point jump would shave about $6 billion off banks' pre-tax and provision profits of about $46 billion for fiscal 2016.
Cyclicals are likely to remain relatively insulated from any shakedown triggered by higher bond yields. Not only are material and energy companies enjoying higher prices for their output, they reduced debt to cope with the decline in commodity prices from their record highs in 2011.
If recent slides on stock markets are part of a large downward repricing of all assets, then watch out. Housing is especially exposed and a correction to home prices would have widespread effects on many industries, not just banking.
For starters, there will be fewer people passing through Sydney Airport on holiday.
More from Morningstar
• Why the US election won't dictate long-term market performance
Martin Conlon is head of Australian equities with Schroders. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind.
© 2016 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.