Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Technical Analysis Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Learn
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features Technical Analysis SMSFs Learn
About

News

The good, the bad and the ugly in emerging markets

Alex Duffy  |  30 Jan 2017Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  

Page 1 of 1

I don't think anyone would have predicted that 2016 would be quite as eventful as it turned out to be, but while a lot happened, not a lot actually changed. To my mind, investing, particularly in emerging markets (EM), always requires a patient, judicious approach, and 2016 was no different.

The list of issues to worry about is a long one: exchange rates, interest rates, growth rates, political uncertainty--my developed market peers have a lot on their plate! If nothing else, 2016 reminded markets that the issues above are not just the preserve of emerging markets.

Globalisation has driven ever greater linkages across geographies and asset classes. Any perceived interference therefore creates volatility which is immediately transmitted across the investment universe. With that in mind, there are a couple of things I did want to comment on.

1) The fund remains underweight energy

Robust corporate governance and prudent capital allocation are two of my most important considerations when it comes to stock selection.

Historically, the majority of the state-owned EM energy sector (which includes Russia but also China and elsewhere) have made incredibly bad capital allocation decisions.

Over time this tends to result in a significant impairment of shareholder value, which is in my experience not a price worth paying for the odd period of cyclical improvement.

For this reason, I continue to be discerning when it comes to stock selection, focusing on minimising the risk of a permanent loss of capital before cyclical valuation expansion. 

2) Indian demonetisation a long-term positive

The Indian government's controversial decision late last year to demonetise its 500 and 100 rupee notes to curb "black money" may be an incredibly positive development in the long term, given the limitations which informality imposes on the ability of an economy to continue to develop.

Bringing black money back into the formal banking system will, in theory, lead to a reduction in long-term funding costs and lower the cost of capital for infrastructure and investment project.

These factors are badly needed for India to maintain the current rate of economic growth, generate jobs for its large population, and avoid the inflationary pressures which fast consumer growth without a commensurate increase in fixed asset investment will create.

In the short term, however, such draconian measures have created sizable problems and there will likely be a significant contraction in near-term demand as the demonetisation process works its way through.

The inability to transact and problems accessing cash is obvious in terms of how consumer demand and purchasing has declined since the demonetisation measures were announced.

Yours truly can testify to the very real impact of such measures on a recent trip to Northern India when I was forced to purchase a $3 lunch with a $30 note, only to receive my change in 10 rupee notes--all 180 of them!

The demand air pocket needs to be carefully considered when looking at the valuation multiples of a number of stocks, particularly those in the consumer sector which rely on the cash economy for end demand.

3) Trumponomics: A little overdone

This is the most difficult topic for me as while one can rationalise to an extent the improvement in commodity prices, it does look overdone in light of the actual impact the US has on global commodity demand.

Additionally, the disconnect between EM exchange rates and commodity prices is a phenomenon which typically hasn't persisted for long in the past, that is, either EM foreign exchange will strengthen or commodity prices will pull back.

In all likelihood, we will see a combination of both, and from this starting point, it may be a little late to blanket buy resource stocks. As ever, I do think there are some selective opportunities in this area--Grupo Mexico, African Rainbow Minerals to name a few.

More from Morningstar

• Bond market down but not out despite hitting 30-year low

• No shortage of knock-out punches for markets in 2017

 

Alex Duffy is portfolio manager of the Fidelity Global Emerging Markets Fund. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.

© 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.