Christine St Anne: In this month's exchange traded fund or ETF wrap up. I'm joined by Alex Prineas, who talks to us about how the products have performed and the new product from UBS.
Alex Prineas: Thanks, Christine.
St Anne: Alex, so, what were the best performing ETFs in the month of September?
Prineas: The best performing ETFs were mostly commodity related. So, we saw an announcement of policy from the US Federal Reserve. It's been dubbed QE-Infinity. It's basically a commitment to continue the policy of quantitative easing indefinitely.
So, that has all sorts of repercussions some of which have do with possibly debasing the US dollar and so precious metal ETFs were popular in September. So, we saw things like ETFS Physical Silver was up more than 12 per cent and we also saw strong runs from the ETFS Physical Platinum and BetaShares gold bullion.
There were also some industrial and energy products that also did well. So, ETFS Natural Gas and ETFS Industrial Commodities ETF were both up more than 10 per cent each. The only non-commodity related ETF that performed strongly although it was in the top 10 over the month was iShares MSCI Hong Kong product, but we know that the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the US dollar. So, when you get an announcement quantitative easing, you can't say a liquidity injection into Hong Kong, so that may have been related.
St Anne: The not so good performers?
Prineas: Well, funnily enough, the worst performing ETFs were also commodity related products and I think that highlights in the short run, the commodity complex doesn't necessarily move in unison, but the worst performing products were more agricultural or oil related. So, we saw ETFS Agriculture and BetaShares Crude Oil both down around 5 per cent. Oil prices were limited during the month by an oil production pledge from Saudi Arabia and then it wasn't surprising to see some weakness in agricultural commodity prices. They had a very strong run in the previous few months on the back of the U.S. drought.
I guess commodity prices can be volatile and they can also be un-correlated to other asset classes they can be affected by things like crop yields, the weather, political decisions. So we often see commodity related ETFs at the top or bottom of performance tables in the short run and this month they dominated both the top and the bottom of the tables.
St Anne: Alex, UBS has recently launched a new ETF product. Can you give us an insight into this product and how it differs from the existing ETFs out there in the market?
Prineas: Yeah, the UBS product is an interesting one and it's based on buy ratings from UBS's fundamental equity research team. They have some quality filters overlaid, so you end up with a 40 stock portfolio. But ultimately I guess you could say it is a rules based ETF, but those rules are based on an underlying group of equity investors looking for attractive stocks.
So, UBS can't market it as an active ETF, because the regulation in Australia doesn't allow that. But essentially it is an ETF with an active stock selection component to it or a listed fund, I guess you could call it. The pricing also suggests that that's where it's pitched with a fee of 0.7 per cent. Looks quite expensive if you compare it to passive or index based ETFs. But if you compare it to an actively managed fund, say your average Australian shares, unit trust or super fund, the pricing looks more competitive. So, UBS's product is an interesting development. It's an example of the lines being blurred between ETFs and actively managed unit trusts or funds.
St Anne: Alex, thanks so much for your insights today.
Prineas: Thanks Christine.