A permanent state of distorted reality

Glenn Freeman  |  30/06/2016Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  

Glenn Freeman: I'm Glenn Freeman for Morningstar. I'm here in Magellan's Sydney offices with CEO Hamish Douglass.

Hamish, thanks for joining us today.

Hamish Douglass: My pleasure, Glenn.

Freeman: Hamish, what's your view ahead of the Brexit vote in terms of global markets? If Britain exits, do you see a knock-on effect?

Douglass: I think in terms of a large macro event in the world, I think it's much more short-term noise than reality. And actually, leaving the EU is very different to leaving the Eurozone. The Eurozone, you're a member of the monetary union, but you're obviously part of the political and trade union as a part of the EU. The U.K. is only a part of the EU. They've got their separate currency and they've got the pound. So, I don't think it really sets a precedent, if it was to happen, for a pulling apart of the Eurozone.

I think that is far more complex, and re-domiciling currencies is far more complex than somebody leaving effectively a trade pact and somewhat of a political pact.

But I would expect in the short term there would be quite some market volatility. But do I expect major global ramifications from a Brexit? No, I don't. I think there's more noise than reality around it at the moment.

Freeman: Now, in global bond yields, we're seeing record lows across a number of countries at the moment. What's your view on this and how does it play into your investment approach?

Douglass: Well, first of all, I'd say we're in a very bizarre point in history.

We have three major nations in the world where we currently have their 10-year bond yields in negative territory, being Japan, Germany and Switzerland.

This is an extraordinary proposition. We've had central banks who have printed over $10 trillion worth of money, I think it's up around $11 trillion now, and we have, I think, total bonds in the world that are negative yielding across the full spectrum, we have US$10 trillion worth of bonds in negative territory.

And these actions by the banks around the world have absolutely bent the risk spectrum curve and it has had a dramatic effect on asset pricing. Bond markets are most obvious, but it's affected all asset prices around the world.

The question is, will this environment change? Are we in some sort of permanently new state of what I'd call distorted reality?

Or are we at a point where we will start unwinding some of the effects of these over the next few years and get, I think, lower bonds than we've had historically but not these negative bond yields that we're seeing in these countries. There is no economic justification for these negative bond yields.

If long-term bond rates rose, absolutely there will be an effect on asset prices around the world. We think it's more than likely that will happen over the next two to three years.

We are not talking about super high rates. But we are just talking about 10-year rates being negative just is not a sustainable reality of the world and even the U.S. rates, their economic situation does not dictate long-term rates at 1.5 per cent, even current inflation expectations of 1.7 per cent.

So, you have negative real rates of return in the United States for an economy with an unemployment rate of less than 5 per cent, with much of the inflationary or deflationary forces likely to be transitory over time. So, I think we're at an odd point in history, Glenn.

I think people need to understand, and I would strongly argue, that what the central banks are doing at the moment with their policies are not actually having any economic benefit.

Markets may like it, but they are not having any economic benefit any more. Rates have got to a level where it's not inducing anyone to borrow money. People will still borrow money if rates were 3 per cent or 4 per cent.

Being down at sort of zero doesn't actually change the desire to invest in the world. So, what you're doing is you are transferring a massive amount of wealth from savers to borrowers.

If borrowers aren't borrowing any more money, but you're stealing wealth from savers, but the borrowers aren't doing anything, is that positive for economic growth or is it actually negative to economic growth?

We would argue that this repression on savers is actually turning out to be counter-productive.

They need to find a solution, but more of this is actually doing more harm than good, in our view. At some point this will change.

Exactly what it changes into is a great unknown. But it has affected asset prices dramatically. Over the last seven years, asset prices are very inflated and eventually, when this changes in some form, asset prices will get affected.

Freeman: On currency movements, how do you factor currency trends into your approach and where do you sit in terms of hedged versus unhedged?

Douglass: Well, largely, we only run a fully hedged and a fully unhedged strategy, Glenn. So, we're not taking directional positions around the currency.

We may decide not to invest in certain stocks, because we may be nervous around a macroeconomic issue.

A number of years ago we were very cautious on the Brazilian real; we were cautious on the Canadian dollar. There have been times when we've been cautious on the Australian dollar and we may not have made investments because currencies may have been taken into effect. But we don't speculate on currencies.

In terms of using a fully hedged or a fully unhedged product, if I was thinking as an investor, maybe people would watch out what I've done personally over time, because I actually have to lodge any investments I made,

When the currency hit $0.68, I actually bought some of our fully-hedged product and when it was in the mid-70s, I was buying our unhedged global equity strategy.

At $0.68 even though the currency could well go lower at point, taking a medium to long-term view I would regard $0.68 to the US$1 as most likely to be neutral to beneficial to you over the long-term, and when the currency is sort of above $0.75, I would take the view that it's certainly going to be neutral to beneficial to be unhedged to the dollar.

So, I think about where long-term exchange rates are and if you're a long-term investor, think about that in terms of whether you would have part of your portfolio hedged or unhedged.

The other factor I would say to people is currency isn't the determinant in the long term of investment performance.

If stocks go up, if we could invest and our stocks go up at 10 per cent per annum compound, we are in a world where every seven years we're doubling the investment returns.

If the currency goes, over a period, from $0.70 to $0.85 over seven years, you may be talking of 3 per cent or 4 per cent per annum. It's important directionally getting that right, but actually the compounding effect of the stock returns is far more important than the currency aspect.

If the currency is well out of whack, like when it was over parity to the U.S. dollar, I used to almost preach to some people to say ‘just think about the reality of the situation, where Australian residents can travel overseas and feel like they are Swiss citizens’.

It just hasn't happened in history and it's very unlikely – this is a cycle – this is very unlikely to prevail.

So, I was urging people if they haven't thought about offshore investing when we were over parity to say, ‘well, maybe this is one time in your life, we should do it and do it unhedged because not only may be being offshore investments could be beneficial, you're probably going to get a tailwind from the currency at some point.

It’s very difficult to pick exactly when it happens, but it's not that difficult to understand when currencies can be dramatically out of whack with long-term averages.

Freeman: Hamish, thank you very much for your time.

Douglass: A pleasure, Glenn.

Freeman: I'm Glenn Freeman for Morningstar. Thanks for watching.

Video Archive...

Earnings season wrap: Telstra feels competitive heat
17/02/2017  As the 1H17 earnings season rolls on, Wesfarmers posts a bumper profit, Newcrest restores its interim dividend, while Telstra's profit falls as it feels the heat of intense competition.
Earnings season wrap: Rio Tinto's dividend surprises
10/02/2017  Rio Tinto delivers a surprise full-year payout of US$1.70, NAB records a soft first quarter, and CIMIC posts an annual net profit in line with Morningstar's expectations.
Leveraging the opportunity of international students
07/02/2017  Co-founder and CEO of Navitas, Rod Jones, explains the firm's business model, which is built largely around international students and university partnerships.
Xero CFO gives outlook for 2017 and beyond
02/02/2017  Sankar Narayan, chief operating and financial officer of accounting software firm Xero gives his insights on the company's business model and outlook, with Morningstar analyst Gareth James adding his views
Asia growth engine not threatened by Trump, says Barings
30/01/2017  Long-term investors in China and wider Asian equities should not worry about President Trump, says Barings head of Asian equities Hjung Jin Lee.
Shifting fortunes for ANZ, more of the same for CBA in 2017
12/01/2017  Australian banks are well-positioned as they head into 2017, with ANZ moving from least profitable in 2016 to become one of the sector's top performers and CBA remaining an investor favourite.
Is Trump a threat to emerging markets?
12/01/2017  Is President Donald Trump a threat to emerging market returns? Paul Jackson from the UK-based Source ETF considers the outlook for sector and where investors can find the best opportunities.
Platinum, Aussie banks and Peter Warnes among top interviews of 2016
22/12/2016  We look back on some of our most notable interviews of the year, as Morningstar analysts and external experts helped us delve into some of the biggest events that shaped Australian and global markets in 2016.
Oil price finds sweet spot, while mining hits rock bottom
20/12/2016  The rise in oil prices should see improved performances from Australian producers in 2017, while mining services companies will continue to struggle amid weaker Chinese demand, says Morningstar equity analyst Mark Taylor.
How Greek mythology can make you a better investor
07/12/2016  Don't be over confident or follow the herd, and like Odysseus, learn to have yourself "tied to the mast" when it comes to long-term investing.
Supermarket headwinds prompt fair value cut for majors
06/12/2016  Growing competitive pressures and a declining revenue outlook for Australia's two grocery giants now look to be part of a longer-term, structural shift.
What returns should you expect from markets?
01/12/2016  As market risks rise, investors must adjust their profit expectations--gone are the days of 8 per cent returns. But there are still growth opportunities out there if you know where to look.
Why healthcare stocks got a bump from Trump
28/11/2016  Australian healthcare and pharmaceutical companies continue to enjoy a purple patch, and for various reasons including the recent US election result, explains Morningstar's healthcare equities analyst Chris Kallos.
Equity and hybrid investors react as bond prices tumble
24/11/2016  The negative correlation between bonds and equities is reasserting itself following the US election of Donald Trump, according to John Likos, Morningstar's senior credit analyst.
2 global themes that are finding favour among ETF investors
15/11/2016  Australian retail investors are increasingly turning to ETFs for specific tactical exposures to global themes, particularly in the context of large-scale market events such as US election 2016.
Maintain discipline and stick to fundamentals when selecting stocks
14/11/2016  Steer clear of fads, maintain a disciplined approach and focus on company fundamentals in building and maintaining your investment portfolio, says Anton Tagliaferro, investment director, Investors Mutual
How Trump could impact economic growth
10/11/2016  Slowdowns in trade and immigration could hold back the US, and infrastructure spending could boost GDP, but it's too early to make any major changes to our economic forecast, says Morningstar's Bob Johnson.
President Trump: What should you do?
10/11/2016  Donald Trump has beaten Hillary Clinton to become the 45th US president. What should investors do?
Software companies worth watching amid tech deployment phase
08/11/2016  Kate Howitt, portfolio manager at Fidelity International discusses some of the core phases in technological disruption and identifies software companies among those currently presenting opportunities.
Kerr Neilson hot, cold and tepid on Europe, US and China
07/11/2016  Platinum co-founder and CEO Kerr Neilson explains his views on the major global markets and outlines where he sees opportunities--and where he doesn't.