Should the home affect Age Pension eligibility?

--  |   11/11/2019 Text size  Decrease  Increase   |  
<p><strong>Glenn Freeman</strong>: In this edition of "Ask the Expert," I'm speaking with Graham Hand from Firstlinks.</p> <p>Now, Graham, firstly, many of our viewers here will recognise you from Firstlinks, which has just recently become part of the Morningstar fold. I think we're into three weeks now.</p> <p><strong>Graham Hand</strong>: Yeah.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: So, firstly, how is it going in the time you've been here with us so far?</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Yeah, it's been great, Glenn. Everyone is really welcoming. And I like this opportunity to expand the sort of services that we offer to our readers, the whole range of things that we were finding it difficult to find time to do that at Firstlinks, but also expand our audience reach into the Morningstar readers as well.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: Yeah. And I just want to take the opportunity today to ask you about &ndash; so, one of the poll questions because you regularly run polls on Firstlinks &ndash; and you were asking your readers what they thought about this long-running discussion that's been out there about whether the family home should be included in the Age Pension assets test. And you've had some &ndash; for a relatively low key poll, you've had quite a number of responses and some really interesting comments on the site.</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Yeah, it was very interesting. And it's obviously a very controversial subject. We had something like 700 responses. So, a good sample. And the issue here is that a lot of people feel there's inequity that someone could have, say, a $2 million family home and only have maybe $0.5 million of other assets. So, they got $2.5 million of total assets. They would be entitled to almost a full age pension. And that comes with other benefits such as cheaper pharmaceuticals and medicines and access to the pension loan scheme. Whereas another person might have a family home worth, say, $1 million. But because they've got $1.5 million outside of the family home, they're not entitled to any pension at all nor any of those medical benefits, yet they have the same assets. So, you can imagine that it's a very sort of controversial subject depending on which side of that fence you're on.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: Is it on the policy agenda now that specific question?</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Look, governments consider this a no-go zone because a lot of people who own their family home and sometimes very valuable, not always but sometimes very valuable, are cash poor. So, they rely on the fact that they get an age pension even though they might be in a multimillion-dollar house. So, you can see that literally that's the sort of a really difficult one. So, even with the new retirement incomes review that's been organized, Josh Frydenberg, the Treasurer, specifically taken this off the table. So, I'd say, at the moment, it's not on the policy agenda because of the political difficulty.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: Taking a bit of a step back, speaking about the retirement income review more broadly, what can people expect from this retirement income review and what should they not expect? Because we've obviously seen some watering down of that by Treasurer Frydenberg in recent weeks.</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Yes, the government has tried to make it clear that this is a fact-based rather than a recommendation-based design review. And they're hoping that the review will come with a range of ways to think about retirement income and superannuation that the industry will largely accept and help to take the debate forward.</p> <p>So, what might they can consider? One of the big issues in superannuation is, should we go from the current 9.5% superannuation guarantee up to what is currently legislated up to 12%. But of course, governments could change whether that happens. So, there's two divides on that. On the one hand, people say, if you look at the way Australia is changing, you go back 30, 40 years, we used to have seven workers for every retired person. So, that was tax revenue to pay for pensions and health. If you go forward to where the intergenerational report goes to in 2045, they expect only 2.7 workers for every retired person. So, the question is, where's the money coming from?</p> <p>And so, the people who argue for the 12% into super, are really saying, well, people have to become far more self-sufficient. So, you need incentives around the superannuation system to encourage people to save for their retirement. The people who say we should stay at, say, 9.5% argue that you're actually forcing people, often people who can't afford it, to forego current consumption for future consumption. And even to the extent, say, people maybe not be able to afford a house by the time they're 30 or 35, because they've got money in super. And you can sort of see this sort of sympathy on both sides.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: Yeah. And certainly, in the current environment, that's something we're seeing where the government is trying, pulling all sorts of levers trying to get consumption to pick up and yes, increasing the SG in a time like this, for instance, would seem to be quite counterintuitive.</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Yeah. And there's a lot of argument about if money goes into superannuation, does that come out of people's wages or is it in addition to? But if you think about what a good retirement means, if you own your own house in retirement, even if you're on the pension &ndash; and I'm not suggesting this is at all a way for someone to sort of plan their life. I'm talking about, whether you could sort of do okay &ndash; then the full age pension for a couple per week is about $720. Now, if you don't own your own house, you're seriously struggling on that. If you own your own house, you can sort of probably do okay, not saying you shouldn't aspire to that.</p> <p>So, you could say that owning your own house is a very important part of retirement planning. So, allow people to do that by allowing them to have money earlier in their life, versus this argument about putting more into superannuation. So, it's a sort of fact base that the government hopes the retirement income review will add some dimension to. I mean, age pension is an interesting thing that people &ndash; if you actually think about it, it's a sort of government guaranteed index-linked perpetual annuity. It's actually a pretty good fallback position, but you certainly would want to top it up by owning your own house or having other savings. So that's one possibility.</p> <p>I think that the other thing the review might look at is, there's still a lot of confusion in the industry over whether an asset should be a growth asset or a defensive asset and I'd like a bit more work done on that.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: Assets that are held inside superannuation?</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Yeah. Because what you end up with, it makes it very difficult to compare superannuation funds and there's a big focus on how well are the superannuation funds going. But when they say it's in a balanced fund with 70% growth, but then in each of the industry, each of the retail or industry funds or funds generally put different assets into what they consider defense. There's no rules.</p> <p><strong>Freeman</strong>: Yeah, what is a growth asset and what's not.</p> <p><strong>Hand</strong>: Exactly. So, sometimes what looks like a fund doing really well, they just happen to have got more sort of growth type asset sometimes in what other people call defensive. And if the market has been going well, they look like they're outperforming. But it's in many ways, the way they've been categorizing the investment. It's actually more aggressive than it looks like when they say they are defensive. So, that's sort of fact-based thing. But we shouldn't expect any recommendations. This is not like say a Royal Commission where they'll have witnesses and interrogation. It won't be anything like that.</p>

Video Archive...

Should the home affect Age Pension eligibility?
11/11/2019  Whether the family home should be part of the Age Pension asset test continues to stir debate in Australia as do broader issues around retirement and superannuation, explains Graham Hand.
There’s more to running an SMSF than paperwork and penalties
04/11/2019  Complexity has long been a bugbear of SMSF trustees, for whom the administrative burden is a necessary evil, but changes are afoot to help reduce the hassle, says Vanguard’s Robin Bowerman.
Safeguarding your finances against cognitive decline
17/06/2019  The risk of financial mistakes and fraud rise exponentially among individuals experiencing cognitive decline, but there are ways to minimise your financial vulnerability.
Blend funds to improve SMSF investment mix, says PineBridge
14/06/2019  SMSFs have long been prone to a strong home market bias, but adding a blend of funds can add diversification without blowing out costs or risk, says PineBridge’s Hani Redha.
A blueprint for building your financial plan
22/05/2019  A new book offers straightforward advice from start to finish.
Super policy shifts and the retirement roadmap
15/11/2018  Saving for retirement is well catered-for within existing superannuation provisions, but the transition to pension mode isn’t as developed, says Vanguard’s Robin Bowerman.
Consumption drives investment not the other way around
09/11/2018  As Australia’s equity market nears its peak and share buy-backs hit unsustainable levels, investors need to also be mindful of rising interest rates and government policy, says Morningstar's Peter Warnes.
Switching up your SMSF for income
08/11/2018  There are still considerable benefits when switching your SMSF to drawdown phase, despite the complexities and potential political changes ahead, says SMSF Association’s Peter Hogan. 
SMSF paperwork crucial to avoid legal problems
02/11/2018  Recent SMSF court cases in Queensland highlight the importance of keeping your documentation in line, says lawyer Shane Ellis.
Will You Hit Your Projected Retirement Date?
03/10/2018  Many factors can impact when you can retire, so targeting a specific date to stop working may not be an ideal strategy. 
Retirement income: expectations versus reality
24/09/2018  Schroders' global head of retirement discusses how investors approaching retirement can fill the retirement income gap, and why professional advice is so important.
The importance of flexible retirement planning
14/08/2018  Building a contingency plan around when you intend to retire is better than setting a firm date ahead of time, according to a recent study from Morningstar's head of retirement research.
Why you need a retirement policy statement
25/07/2018  A document detailing your retirement plans – both in the lead-up and once you begin drawing on your savings – is a great idea, according to Morningstar's US-based director of personal finance.
VIDEO | Investors hoard cash at their peril, says JP Morgan
07/06/2018  When it comes to thinking about retirement, a survey of Hong Kong investors mirrors errors made by investors in the developed world at large: they are saving too little and relying too much on cash, says JP Morgan's Wina Appleton
Shifting laws not denting SMSF demand
01/11/2017  The advantages of a self-managed super funds continue to outweigh the negatives, even though frequent legislative changes add complexity, according to Natasha Fenech, CEO, SuperConcepts.
Superannuation not political football
19/10/2017  The politicisation of Australia's super system; greater uptake of income streams in retirement; and the policy alignment of aged care and retirement planning.
Earnings season FY17 mixed bag so far
18/08/2017  Aside from a few high-profile earnings guidance misses, large-cap stocks are doing okay as FY17 reporting season passes halfway, says AMP chief economist Shane Oliver.
Self-managed super is not Do-it-yourself
03/07/2017  There are a few common pitfalls in running a self-managed super fund that mean trustees shouldn't go it alone entirely, says BT Financial Group's head of financial literacy, Bryan Ashenden.
3 pockets of opportunity in fixed income
07/06/2017  The head of PIMCO Australia gives his views on active management in fixed income and tells us where he sees most value in this space.
No free lunch as fixed-income market shifts
07/04/2017  More difficult market conditions in a rising interest rate environment highlight the value of active management across your portfolio, says Simon Doyle, Schroders' head of fixed income and multi-asset.