Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn
About

News

'Apocalyptic' Brexit warnings stir controversy

Morningstar.co.uk Editors  |  03 Dec 2018Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Mark Carney Brexit Warning

With the December 11 parliamentary vote on the Brexit deal looming, there were two key interventions this week that caused controversy.

On Wednesday morning, the Chancellor Philip Hammond admitted that Theresa May’s current Brexit deal, as agreed with the European Union, would leave the economy “slightly” worse off than remaining in the EU.

But this warning, coming alongside the Government’s official forecasts for EU exit, was overshadowed the same afternoon by the Bank of England’s economic scenarios for a no-deal Brexit.

A disorderly Brexit would trigger the worst economic slump since the second world war, the Bank said, with an 8 per cent drop in economic growth within a year. The Bank and the Government’s forecasts for lost economic output tallied with each other, but Threadneedle Street expects the rate of decline to be steeper than the Treasury is modelling.

The headline figures were alarming to UK consumers and investors: a 33 per cent fall in house prices, a collapse in sterling to below parity with the dollar, a hike in interest rates to 5.5 per cent, and a nearly doubling in the unemployment rate to 7.5 per cent. Stock and bond markets are expected to be highly volatile under a no-deal Brexit.

While the Bank’s stress tests were intended as “worst-case scenario” the intense media reaction revived memories of “Project Fear” before the 2016 referendum. At the time the Bank’s Governor, the then Chancellor George Osborne, and the IMF predicted that voting Leave would inflict serious damage on the UK economy.

Yesterday, former Monetary Policy Committee member Andrew Sentence said the Bank risks being accused of “getting unnecessarily involved in politics”, especially with the drama of the Parliament vote on Brexit still to come.

“The Bank of England is undermining its credibility and independence by giving such prominence to these extreme scenarios and forecasts,” Sentence said on Thursday.

City regulator the Financial Conduct Authority released its impact assessments for Brexit on Thursday, and stuck to the impartial tone adopted by the Bank.

"As a public body, the FCA takes no position on the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union as such. Nor do we advocate a particular approach to withdrawal," the FCA said.

Bank of England "Agnostic" on Brexit Options

In the official statement put out by the Bank on Wednesday, there was some attempt to forestall accusations of the central bank straying from its apolitical remit: “They are not assessments of the relative long-term merits of different trading relationships.”

Bank Governor Mark Carney reinforced the point in a BBC Radio 4 interview for the Today programme, where he  defended questions from John Humphrys about which option he “preferred” by saying the Bank is “absolutely agnostic”.

“Parliament demanded this analysis, but it is analysis with a purpose and the purpose is to get the system ready,” Carney insisted.

Responding to criticism that these are "apocalyptic" warnings, Carney said in the interview that these should be considered “scenarios” of “what could happen if everything goes wrong” and not “forecasts” of likely events.

Fewer than half of British businesses had put into place contingency plans for a no-deal Brexit, the Bank said, as it backed the transition period for allowing companies to prepare for EU withdrawal.

Those searching for some positives in these scenarios could be reassured by analysis showing that the UK’s major banks all passed the stress tests for a no-deal Brexit.

The Bank’s Financial Policy Committee said that UK banks could continue to serve households and businesses, even taking into account £70 billion of losses to the sector – a similar figure to the money spent bailing out Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Lloyds Banking Group (LLOY) during the financial crisis.

The 2008-9 crisis is the only comparably extreme period of recent economic history for a no-deal Brexit: the Bank expects the economic impact to be worse than 10 years ago, but Carney said the financial system is one area that people should not worry about with banks now much better capitalised.

More from Morningstar

• Retail wrap: sales grow for Harvey Norman, but proof will be in the Christmas pudding for Myer

• Loan book growth lifts MyState profits

• Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial

Any Morningstar ratings/recommendations contained in this report are based on the full research report available from Morningstar.

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782. The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend