Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn


Equities for income, bonds for growth

Laura Frost  |  12 Nov 2019Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Investors have traditionally used equities and bonds to serve two different functions in their portfolios: they invest in companies’ equity to capture the growth of the economy, and in bonds to provide a steady income in the form of coupon payments.

Traditional wisdom when investing your pension is to start with your portfolio almost entirely in equities, which will grow in value throughout one’s career. Over the long run, the average return on equities is roughly 10 per cent a year, while bonds return on average 5 per cent.

As you approach retirement, you gradually shift your portfolio from equities to bonds in order to protect the value of your pension pot and ensure a steady income stream once you retire. But while bonds still provide a defensive way to preserve capital value, does the adage that equities are for growth, and bonds for income, hold true in the current economic environment?

Not in Germany, France, Japan and the UK, where real yields on government bonds (which we’ve calculated as nominal yield minus the CPI rate of inflation – currently 1.7 per cent) are negative even up to 30 years – see the chart below. Years of securities purchases under central banks’ quantitative easing programmes, along with seemingly low growth in the world’s core economies, has led to continued downward pressure on bond yields.

We have seen significant yield compression even on government bonds in peripheral European countries such as Italy. Investors must lend to Italy for as many as seven years just to get a positive real yield.


Those who think of bonds as the boring, income-generating part of their portfolio need to think again: some of these bonds come with no income at all.

Investing Compass
Listen to Morningstar Australia's Investing Compass podcast
Take a deep dive into investing concepts, with practical explanations to help you invest confidently.
Investing Compass

But fixed income has always been a relative game. Investors must look between cash, government bonds and corporate bonds to find the best relative value. While for some investors, this choice has led to more the decision to hold more cash in their portfolio, others have become tourists into riskier assets.

Faced with negative yields across core government bond curves (with the notable exception of the US), no wonder some investors have decided to look to lower credit quality assets away from their comfort zone in search of yield. Those who invested in government bonds have moved to investment grade, upper investment grade to BBBs, and BBBs to high yield. Many investors are also looking to emerging markets in search of better fundamental value.

One worry is that when volatility next picks up in fixed income markets, these tourists in unfamiliar asset classes will want out at any price. As investors shift back up the quality spectrum, we may see significant price action in risk assets.

Another effect of this tourism into credit is that it means that negative yields spread: as more investors buy credit, risk premia compress and bonds which were once attractive for their income no longer provide any at all. The full extent of this is surprising – see the chart below.


Partly an effect of ECB buying, partly of this credit tourism, now more than €1trillion of corporate bonds in the ER00 European corporates index are negative yielding. In fact, all of the bonds of some issuers now have negative yields: the basic industry sector leads the way, with 25 per cent of issuers having totally negative-yielding curves, followed by capital goods (23 per cent) and banking and autos (both 22 per cent).

Most of this negative-yielding corporate debt is actually in the lower end of investment grade, namely A and BBB-rated. Seen in this light, the “equities for growth, bonds for income” adage is reversed. Dividend-yielding equities provide income – indeed, the FTSE 100 currently yields around 4.5 per cent - while these negative-yielding government and corporate bonds do not.

So, how should investors think about fixed income in this previously unknown environment? Even if these bonds provide no income, they can still provide capital growth. With central banks cutting interest rates, owning duration has been the trade of the year so far. Negative real yielding bunds, French OATs and gilts have all posted positive total returns year to date.

What about next year? The current environment of more modest inflation, with few visible green shoots of growth in core developed economies, is supportive for bonds. Aided by central banks’ quantitative easing programmes, continued buying of government and corporate bonds squeezes yields down and boosts their capital value. And bonds love bad news. Any “risk off” sentiment resulting from deterioration in global politics and the economy would further support this downward pressure on bond yields.

On the other hand, one big risk to this trade is the possibility of further government bond issuance by populist leaders – think Jeremy Corbyn and Democrat frontrunner Elizabeth Warren. Their spending promises are unlikely to be funded fully by planned tax increases, so probably mean more bond issuance. As with any resource, an increase in supply pushes prices down.

Whatever happens next year, in this strange new world of low and now negative yields, investors need to take a more active approach and not rely on conventional wisdom which doesn’t hold true in a post-QE world. For many investors in 2019, equities were for income, and bonds for growth.

is a UK-based fixed income specialist and member of the M&G Bond Vigilantes team.

This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria. 

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'regulated financial advice' under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information, refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Morningstar’s full research reports are the source of any Morningstar Ratings and are available from Morningstar or your adviser. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782. The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend