Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn


The US China trade war is evolving to a new Cold War

Morningstar Equity Analysts  |  28 Nov 2018Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

The escalating tensions between the US and China can no longer be accurately described as a mere trade war, in our view. Instead, recent developments suggest that the countries are teetering on the edge of a new Cold War. In fact, we think the situation has deteriorated over the past few months.

Vice President Mike Pence's recent major policy speech on China at the Hudson Institute outlined several serious concerns regarding China in unusually blunt language, such as Chinese interference with US elections, cyberattacks, unfair government subsidies, and theft of American technology.

The language is, in our view, calculated to shock Chinese government officials who are used to hiding more stern pronouncements behind soft language. The scope of Pence's speech went far beyond mere trade issues.

In particular, China's industrial policy, Made in China 2025, targeting progress in high-tech industries like robotics and artificial intelligence, shifts the battlegrounds to not only across trade, but investments and technology, he said. The US alleges that China is pursuing its industrial policy by illegitimate means, including theft of intellectual property.

Meanwhile, China may see the US concerns less as a desire to uphold international norms and more as an intention to prevent China's rise to economic and geopolitical parity with the US by any means necessary. Furthermore, Pence mingled critique of China's domestic affairs in with the long-standing critique of its international policies by citing Taiwan as a political model and disparaging China's "lip service to reform and opening."

With the increase in trade barriers threatening to sever economic ties between the countries, a new Cold War scenario seems more likely than ever. That said, some believe relations could be thawed with a new administration in 2020, a slowdown in US economic growth, or even that Pence's speech was designed to target US voters ahead of a high-profile midterm election in November.

Trade tensions unlikely to ease

Both sides still seem far apart. China has been reluctant to present a list of concessions to the US unless it can deal with a US government official who can negotiate on behalf of the administration, and earlier talks have been derailed by President Donald Trump overriding a proposed agreement in May.

Investing Compass
Listen to Morningstar Australia's Investing Compass podcast
Take a deep dive into investing concepts, with practical explanations to help you invest confidently.
Investing Compass

Moreover, the confusion over who is negotiating for the US is feeding China's views that Trump may be shifting the goal posts on his trade policy. Altogether, it appears to us that China is calculating that it is better to weather the near-term economic impact rather than give in at this point. In particular, China is unlikely to accede on its Made in China 2025 strategy, especially if it views US complaints as unfair.

From the Chinese perspective, this is a necessary policy for its long-term development. China needs to find ways to escape the middle-income trap, and the standard recipe for this is to move the economy into higher value-added industries, which is what this policy aims to do. Paradoxically, the US's newfound focus on Made in China 2025 makes it less likely that China will reach a settlement with the US on overall trade issues.

If anything, China will pursue Made in China 2025 more aggressively to offset economic any headwinds created by reduced exports to the US. Till now, China has instituted policy changes at a snail's pace to avoid disruption. This is why we thought China would be willing to make some concessions, to avoid volatility, particularly from already-high domestic debt risks. But with China feeling boxed into a corner, leadership may be gearing up for a long march to resist US pressures, including the possibility of using even more debt to cushion the short-term economic blow from tariffs if needed.

Tariffs yet to hit economic data

Most analysts have estimated a muted economic impact for both countries from the tariffs. For example, the IMF lowered its GDP growth forecasts for both countries by 0.2 per cent in 2019 due to trade war impact in its latest World Economic Outlook. It's key to note that any significant impact from tariffs has yet to play out in economic data released so far.

Only the first major round of tariffs; 25 per cent on $50 billion worth of US imports from China at 2017 levels, had an effect in the third quarter. The second round was implemented on Sept. 24, with 10 per cent US tariffs on another $200 billion in imports. Tariffs ramp up aggressively in the next several months. The second-round tariff rate will escalate to 25 per cent from 10 per cent on January 1.

Timeline of Recent Trade War Events

Meanwhile, we think tariffs on the remaining $260 billion in Chinese imports could be implemented in the first quarter, especially if China retaliates against the January 1 US tariffs, although it has not yet announced an intention to do so. Altogether, this means that the average incremental US tariff across all Chinese imports could reach 17 per cent by the second quarter of 2019.

Assuming that US consumers and Chinese producers bear the tariff costs equally, this would equate to about a $40 billion hit, or about 0.2 per cent of China's GDP. The full impact could be much greater, however, because of the likely knock-on effects from workers and businesses in affected industries.

Still, we emphasise that the most impactful issues for the Chinese economy are essentially unchanged from the last several years, trade concerns notwithstanding. China's high debt and how it handles credit growth and deleveraging, reform, and future investment will have more of an impact than higher tariffs on the Chinese economy over the long run.


Preston Caldwell is an analyst at Morningstar

More from Morningstar

3 top-rated ETFs for your portfolio

NAB failures of broader systemic problems

Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial

provide research on nearly 200 Australian and New Zealand stocks.

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'regulated financial advice' under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information, refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Morningstar’s full research reports are the source of any Morningstar Ratings and are available from Morningstar or your adviser. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782. The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend