Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn
About

News

Too many active managers in Australia, says ETF pioneer

Glenn Freeman  |  24 Jul 2018Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Page 1 of 1

Australian ETFs account for only about 4 per cent of total trading volumes, with huge room for growth, says ETF Securities founder Graham Tuckwell.

He created the first gold-tracking exchange-traded fund (ETF), which launched offshore back in 2003. At the time, the US was the only market receptive to the products, which was followed by Europe and then Australia.

"Clients in the US understood what ETFs were; Europe was consistently seven years behind the US in terms of its understanding and adoption of ETFs, and Australia was seven years behind Europe," Tuckwell says.

gold ETF exchange-traded bullion

Graham Tuckwell is responsible for launching the first gold ETF

The EFTPOS guy

He says part of the problem was related to the abbreviation for exchange-traded funds – ETF – which was often confused with EFT – the abbreviation of "electronic funds transfer".

"[The investing industry] also seemed to be very tightly held amongst the advisers, and they had a strong interest in pushing people into the higher margin products," Tuckwell says.

While he lauds the introduction of compulsory superannuation in Australia in the early 1990s, Tuckwell notes there was for a long time no low-cost way for Australians to get access to the equities market, and "a huge vested interest in stopping ETFs".

"In a nutshell, they're simply a lower-cost way of people getting a spread of investments…they're no more complicated than that," he says.

Tuckwell believes ETFs have been helping to bridge this gap.

Active versus passive

Tuckwell believes there are far too many active managers plying their trade in Australia.
"I'm not saying there isn't a role for very clever active fund managers, in fact you need those people out there doing the stock picking, in order to price one security against the other.

"But you don't need 80 per cent of the market doing that, particularly when they're underperforming," he says.

"The majority of money should be invested in the passive stuff, and the pricing of individual securities should be done by the active guys, which should be 10 to 20 per cent of the market.

"And guess what? They will outperform the market…because there will be far fewer of them, and those that are left will actually be doing a good job, and that's where the world's moving to."

The danger of synthetic ETFs

As volatility returned to markets earlier this year, the financial press widely reported the shut-down of a few exchange-traded notes in the US that were short-selling the volatility index (VIX). These are known as "synthetic" products, which make use of derivatives.

"That was one tiny example…and I'm not sure that investors ended up losing any money. You've got billions of dollars of certificates invested in Germany, for example…this is a product that wasn't particularly suited to ETFs, that in my opinion, should've been sold more over the counter.

"It's one product that shouldn't have been put in the ETF wrapper, and to say that the other $5 trillion that was invested is just not the right approach…investors need to open the prospectus and see how it's put together," says Tuckwell.

He believes the use of these "swap-based" vehicles are useful for certain products, such as futures, for others it can be overly risky for less sophisticated investors.

"Just read what the product is, and if you're dealing with a decent issuer, they should explain in plain English.

"To me, unless the buyer is educated, they shouldn't be going anywhere near it. Where you have a short and leveraged platform, it's more complicated, and should be something held over for more sophisticated investors. For me, the bigger issue is one of classification and education," Tuckwell says.

 

More from Morningstar

• How an ageing population impacts investment returns

• Using moats to avoid dividend traps

Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial

 

Glenn Freeman is a senior editor, Morningstar Australia.

© 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend