Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn
About

News

Why a double-income superannuation stash is unrealistic

John Rekenthaler  |  01 Jun 2018Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Page 1 of 1

UK commuters

A Fidelity chart suggesting that people should have hold twice their annual salaries in retirement savings by age 35 set Twitter alight this month. Many younger people were incredulous: is such a thing even feasible? It is: savers must put aside 15 per cent of their pre-tax salary every year and with some friendly market conditions, no miracles need occur.

When calculating required contribution rates for future investment sums, the key item is the rate of return. Over long periods of time, even modest differences in return assumptions will create large disagreements. However, the effect is modest for this exercise, because the time horizon is only 10 years.

What I don't accept is the notion that people "should" plan for such an amount. That is a Twitter invention. I would label Fidelity’s savings targets as stretch goals – achievable for some employees but unrealistic for many others. 

The objective of owning twice one's salary at age 35 is one of several rungs on Fidelity's age-based ladder, which concludes at age 67, with the employee possessing 10 times her salary in retirement assets.

But "nice to have" is a very different thing than "should have." It is nice to own a house outright with no mortgage. It is nice to have a university degree. It is nice to have 10 times one's salary at retirement. Nonetheless, millions of people enjoy full, successful lives without achieving any of those items.

Burning the candle

This is not to criticise the savers. Investing 15% of one's salary throughout one's career, ensuring a prosperous retirement, is a perfectly valid choice. Investing 100 per cent would surely be too much, and investing 0 per cent is likely too little, but 15 per cent lies within the plausible range. So, too, do 8 per cent, 11 per cent and 18 per cent. Some people burn the candle more brightly when they are young, while others prefer to postpone the flame. Who are we to say which is correct?

Email to Friend
Market News and Views Sign up today and receive our free Morning Note e-newsletter, daily in your inbox.

Obviously, those guidelines overstate the need for anybody who will receive a final-salary or defined benefit pension. There aren't many such plans left, and those that do exist are largely being phased out.

They also aren't realistic goals for occupations that require heavy early investment in human capital, or which have steep salary curves. Doctors and lawyers fall into that category – students of both professions are saddled with large debt early in their careers but their lifetime earnings potential should be higher than the average worker.

Also landing in that category are those who are paid in equity. The small businessperson who takes out a loan to start a firm, and who spends her first few years in building a client base, probably won't have much of a retirement portfolio at age 35. However, she may have a very substantial one at age 65.

So you could argue the Twitter exchange was useful in that it generated a discussion about savings and it shocked younger workers into thinking about retirement issues.

More from Morningstar

• How behavioural bias can create investment opportunities

• Equity, credit markets shudder over Italian political turmoil

• Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial

 

John Rekenthaler is vice president of research for Morningstar, based in the US. He is a columnist for Morningstar.com and a member of Morningstar's investment research department. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.

© 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend