Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn


Anti-trust sentiment threatens entire tech sector

Sustainalytics  |  13 Apr 2018Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Page 1 of 1

The software and services industry, inclusive of companies providing enterprise and consumer applications, search engines, e-commerce and internet-based offerings, relies heavily on establishing digital ecosystems and selling cloud-based software and digital ads.

Using ideas originally hatched in garages, major players like Google's parent company Alphabet, Facebook and Microsoft have leveraged platform scale to generate extraordinary growth and now stand as lynchpins in the global economy.

Global IT spending is expected to hit US$3.7 trillion in 2018, and the software and services industry will be the major beneficiary. However, as dominant industry players consolidate market power, exposure to anti-competitive concerns threaten to bring down a regulatory hammer amid growing interest in the idea that software and services giants may need to be broken up.

The past year has seen an uptick in anti-trust sentiment within the tech industry. These concerns are being driven by the perceived abuse of control of a dominant company or set of companies, which negatively impact the general software and services market by excluding smaller competitors from offering comparable goods and services, fixing prices and reducing consumer choice.

Platforms, and the proprietary algorithms that fuel them, enable a company to develop monopolistic characteristics by leveraging token services in one market to expand into secondary markets, all the while creating barriers of entry that stifle competition. By reducing market access and dynamism, benefits to consumers are called into question.

The platform-based business model of software and services companies gives unprecedented access to personal data leveraged for future pathways of monetisation. Through “free” services, companies like Alphabet and Facebook collect user behavioural data as an asset.

Anti-trust fines in the tech industry ESG social governance sustainable investing tech google facebook scandal

While antitrust risks can be identified by tracking penalties, assessing relevant controversies such as anti-competitive practices, data privacy and security, and media ethics, can signal future trajectories of company exposure to antitrust concerns. Over the past five years, Alphabet has experienced the largest number of such incidents.

Alphabet Sits at Centre of Controversy

Alphabet, with a market cap exceeding US$762 billion, is the at the epicentre of global antitrust scrutiny, with ongoing investigations in Europe, Israel, South Korea, India and Japan. Much like the former monopolies Standard Oil and Bell System, Google has established an unparalleled market position through its search engine, which serves as the entryway into the digital world. Despite its positive benefits, some question whether such a concentration of power in one entity is beneficial for consumer welfare.

Google’s offerings, including its search engine, are under intense regulatory scrutiny by the European Commission, and the recurring investigations into its shopping service, Android software and AdSense platform point to an increased likelihood that this advertising-based business model may need to be adjusted. This presents potential for an impact on its revenue base in the long term and future penalties may require changes to its business model.

Google parent company Alphabet has experienced the highest number of anti-trust incidents ESG governance social sustainable scandal tech sector

Alphabet has tried to stem this regulatory pressure by engaging with European regulators although it has been unable to reach a satisfactory compromise. The fundamental issue is the difference between its own view on anti-competitive practices and the European Commission’s view. While Alphabet has initiated the process to appeal the June 2017 penalty, the difference in viewpoints is likely to lengthen this dispute even further

The regulatory scrutiny Alphabet is facing is unlikely to subside in the near term. While Europe has taken a piecemeal approach by targeting different aspects of Alphabet’s business, it is unclear which direction, if any, the US might pursue. Major technology companies will increasingly need to balance their ambitions with their responsibility to their stakeholders.

More from Morningstar

• SMSFs over-exposed to cash amid market uncertainty

• 5 funds to catch the electric wave

Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial


Sustainalytics is an environmental, sustainability and governance ratings specialist.

Morningstar owns 40 per cent of Sustainalytics

© 2018 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend