Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn
About

News

NAB failures part of broader systemic problems

Glenn Freeman with AAP  |  27 Nov 2018Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

The National Australia Bank board should have told management "enough is enough" and to get on with refunding customers charged fees for no service, its chairman has admitted.

NAB spent three years arguing with the corporate regulator about the fees-for-no-service compensation, a timeframe chairman Ken Henry has described as absurd.

Dr Henry, a former head of Treasury, told the banking royal commission the fees-for-no-service issue has hurt the bank's reputation.

"There's absolutely no doubt that the reputation of NAB has been tarnished considerably by these matters and the way in which they've been handled," he told the commission in Melbourne on Tuesday. "There's no doubt about that."

University of Wollongong legal academic and financial services regulatory consultant, Andy Schmulow, says the conclusions drawn from the banking royal commission so far "leave me shaking my head".

Schmulow heads a management consulting firm in both Australia and South Africa, and has a number of South Africa's largest banks among his client base.

Referring to the more than three year delay before NAB executives even began to compensate any of the super members they "gouged" fees from, Schmulow is equally scathing of the regulatory response from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

"Do we seriously neeed to say to people running a government agency, that [you must act] even if expectations imposed on you through legislation don’t explicitly say you must not turn a blind eye, when you see people breaking the law?

"We expect you to work that out for yourselves. If nothing else, give it to the conduct regulator, but you can't just walk away from something like that. You cant walk away from NAB charging fees to super members [and taking] three years to wind that down," Schmulow says.

APRA is due to appear before the royal commission hearings later this week.

Should have acted differently

The NAB chairman, Dr Henry, said while the board didn't run the business, its directors had agreed they should have done some things differently.

"I wish that we had said to management, well certainly two years ago, perhaps even earlier, that we had said: 'Enough is enough. Forget about negotiating with ASIC. Just do it - remediate customers'."

It was only in September this year that NAB reached an agreement with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission about how to handle the adviser service fees compensation.

As recently as May, ASIC told NAB its latest proposal failed to adequately reflect any insight into the seriousness of the bank's suspected misconduct.

Dr Henry agreed NAB's handling of the matter over the three years harmed its relationship with the regulator and prevented it from getting on with the job of remediating its customers.

Senior counsel assisting the commission Rowena Orr QC asked Dr Henry why he didn't tell management in May: "Enough is enough. This is harming our customers. It's harming our reputation with ASIC. Get it fixed and get it fixed now."

Dr Henry said the board did say that at some point.

"We were pretty cross."

Asked if he accepted the board should have stepped in earlier, Dr Henry said "I wish we had, let me put it that way."

Commenting more broadly on the latest and final round of royal commission hearings, Schmulow says with each of the CEOs, "we've seen a tin ear, plus apologies, plus throwing other people under the bus, plus promises about how everything has changed".

"In the hierarchy of responsibiltits for CEOs, the highest priority, I contend, should be 'don't break the law'." He notes Commonwealth Bank breached money laundering laws more than 53,000 times, according to earlier hearings of the royal comission.

Customers placed last

Ms Orr said NAB's remediation proposals did not prioritise customers charged ongoing adviser service fees when they received no advice.

Dr Henry agreed, but said it may have taken years anyway to negotiate with ASIC.

NAB CEO Andrew Thorburn said charging customers for advice they never received was wrong but denied it was dishonest, arguing the bank "accidentally" kept the money.

NAB has had a number of fees-for-no-service problems, including charging the estates of more than 4000 dead superannuation customers $3 million.

ASIC has taken NAB to court over one of the fees-for-no-service issues involving its $100 million charged to hundreds of thousands of superannuation customers.

 

 

. Glenn Freeman is senior editor, Morningstar Australia.

AAP logo

© 2020 Australian Associated Press Pty Limited (AAP) or its Licensors. This is the Morningstar service with content provided by AAP where indicated. AAP reserves all rights, including copyright, in services provided by it. The information in the service is for personal use only, does not constitute financial product advice (whether general or personal) and may not be re-written, copied, re-sold or re-distributed, framed, linked or otherwise used whether for compensation of any kind or not, without the prior written permission of AAP. You should seek advice from a professional financial adviser before making decision to acquire or dispose of a financial product.

This service is published for general information purposes only without assuming a duty of care. AAP is not in the business of providing financial product advice (whether personal or general advice), and gives no warranty, guarantee or other representation about the accuracy of the information or images contained in this service. AAP is not liable for errors, omissions in, delays or interruptions to or cessation of the services through negligence or otherwise. The globe symbol and "AAP" are registered trademarks.

Email To Friend