Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn
About

News

How to find value in global equities

Dan Kemp  |  04 Oct 2017Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Page 1 of 1

Investors should look for pockets of value in global equities--but beware concentrating their portfolio in risky sectors.

 

There is an ongoing debate about the merits of value versus growth--and whether one is more applicable than the other in today's environment. This debate has been particularly acute this year as technology companies have dominated the headlines.

This shift in the appetite of investors has corresponded with a period of strong overall returns for equity investors, which naturally leads to questions about whether global equities offer good value to a contrarian investor.

 

Despite the rhetoric, value and growth share many common attributes


chart

Source: Morningstar Direct, Morningstar Investment Management; calculation to 31/08/2017

 

Morningstar Investment Management creates valuation models for 199 equity sectors, regions, countries, and market-cap groups which we review at least monthly. These models incorporate both long-term fundamental growth expectations as well as an estimate of any valuation-adjustment if an asset moves back to long-term fundamental baseline.

When viewing this data, it becomes clear that expected equity returns have declined sharply across most equity regions and industries over the last two years and the returns currently on offer are considerably below average.

When we break down the sources of return by their components, it is clear the long-term growth prospects are reasonably robust but the prices are unjustifiably high in many regions.

However, with an abundance of countries, industrial sectors, and companies to choose from, it would be foolish to base positioning of a portfolio on a single view of global equities.

Looking under the surface

When viewed at a more granular level, we can see a wide range of expected returns; from those that are very unattractive to others that offer unusually high returns. An investor who builds a portfolio from the most attractive securities may well deliver a decent return over the next decade.

US stocks look overvalued

That said, there are some clear themes within this data that investors should bear in mind before seeking to construct a global equity portfolio that offers contrarian value. The first is that many of the largest parts of the global equity market are the most unattractive.

The most obvious example of this is US equities, which account for approximately 59 per cent of the MSCI world index and according to our analysis offers a valuation-implied return of only 2.5 per cent after inflation, relative to the rest of the world at 5.4 per cent.

Therefore, an investor seeking to build a truly contrarian portfolio must own a portfolio that is very different from the index.
Valuations have a habit of reverting quickly--think of the 2008 financial crisis--but expensive assets frequently become more expensive before rebounding. If a stretch in valuation occurs in a niche asset, such as small-cap technology stocks today, the impact on the overall portfolio may be less significant.

However, if an investor chooses not to own US equities and they become expensive, the investor is likely to suffer significant underperformance against the typical global equity benchmark for a time. Therefore, defining success in relative and absolute terms is important.

Comparing potential investments

The second factor that contrarian investors must consider is the relative attractiveness of assets. How much more attractive is the most attractive asset compared to other assets?

Jeremy Grantham of GMO often refers to relative attractiveness as the "margin of superiority." A high margin of superiority would indicate that it is worth investing significantly in the most attractive asset, while a lower margin of superiority would indicate that investors should adopt a more diversified approach.

This insight reflects the fact that expected returns can never be a perfectly accurate reflection of the future. Therefore, when using contrarian expectations to build a portfolio, investors should place a margin of safety around expected returns.

Assets with a low margin of superiority often have a low margin of safety. In contrast, when an asset appears to be much more attractive, an investor can invest their capital with a greater degree of confidence and conviction.

Russian equities currently rank among the most attractive global equity markets with a margin of superiority of 9.3 per cent a year over our expected return for US equities. Other attractive global markets include UK and Japanese equities with expected returns of 4.7 per cent and 4 per cent above that of US equities, respectively.

Concentration and sizing

While using a margin of superiority approach can help investors assess relative opportunities, it is also important to consider the impact of concentration on a portfolio that is constructed with a contrarian bent.

As asset prices become more expensive and investors increasingly seek out niche opportunities, it is not unusual for the most attractive opportunities to become focused in a particular area of the market. Ignoring such concentration magnifies outcomes--for better and worse--especially if a common fundamental driver performs poorly.

Therefore, being aware of concentration risk is an important step in portfolio construction. While concentration risks are often obvious--for example, commodity-producing countries and mining companies--it is not always so easy to spot. Unchecked this can create a "fault line" that runs through a portfolio and wreaks havoc on the return profile.

A good example of this would be a multi-asset portfolio comprising hedge funds, property, private equity, high-yield bonds, and UK equities. Portfolios of this kind were not uncommon before the financial crises and appear to offer a high level of diversification. However, each of the assets has an underlying exposure to leverage.

As the crisis hit, each of these assets suffered and left investors without the diversification benefit they expected. Naturally, this results in declines that often exceed one's risk tolerance. It is therefore essential that investors understand the fundamental drivers of returns when creating a portfolio.

More from Morningstar

• 6 keys to picking up good small caps

• Incredible India? How stock investors can ride the tiger

• Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial

 

Dan Kemp is chief investment officer, Morningstar Investment Management EMEA. This article initially appeared on the Morningstar UK website.

© 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend