Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn


Political instability creating investment opportunities?

Tom Stevenson  |  12 Oct 2017Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Page 1 of 1

Does politics matter to investors? Read any market report and the answer might seem obvious. Market movements are often explained as reactions to an unfolding political story--Brexit, Catalonia, North Korea, Trump, European elections.


All of these have at times over the past 18 months seemed to be key market drivers. The reality is more nuanced. These five political stories have influenced financial markets in quite different ways from which investors can draw a range of conclusions.

Brexit is the longest-running of the five and to UK investors probably seems the most important. The distinguishing feature of this story is that, unlike some if not all the others, it is having a real economic impact.

In the last week we have seen how the stalling negotiations with the rest of the EU, and the associated Westminster psychodrama, is dragging the UK economy down. A near 10 per cent fall in car sales in the key month of September, dismal construction sector data, and a slide from the top to the bottom of the G7 growth league is starting to look like a worrying trend.

What is interesting from an investment perspective, however, is that this relentless flow of bad news has been largely shrugged off by investors. The FTSE 100 stood at around 6,000 in June 2016. Today it is close to an all-time high above 7,500.

The reason, of course, is that Brexit uncertainty and a rudderless government has hit the value of the pound. And for a market dominated by exporters and overseas earners that has been a positive for sterling-based investors.

Over in Europe, politics has been influential in a quite different way. A year ago, the prospect of a packed electoral calendar across the region cast a long shadow over markets.

Britain's vote to leave the EU and the election of Donald Trump in the US seemed to point to a turning of the tide in Europe towards right-wing populism. Concern about victories for nationalist parties in Holland and France, if not in Germany, ensured that market sentiment was weak as 2017 began.
The reality was more benign. Pragmatism and common sense prevailed in all the key elections and investors have been able to focus on Europe's rapidly improving economy, its supportive central bank, and its rising corporate earnings.

So, in Europe the key influence of politics until recently was to unnecessarily dampen sentiment and so to create investment opportunities. Germany's DAX index is up more than 20 per cent over the past year; Italy's stock market is more than a third higher.

The market reaction to Catalonia's bid for independence has highlighted how dramatic political events can have an outsized influence over investors.

The slide in Spanish shares last week was the biggest in 15 months and outflows from Spanish funds the greatest since an earlier independence poll in 2014. Madrid's Ibex 35 index has fallen by 10 per cent since a high in May, a technical market correction and completely against the tide of European markets as a whole.

Catalonia accounts for a significant proportion of the Spanish economy so the potential for disruption should not be dismissed.

But given how much easier it will be for the region to declare independence than actually to deliver it, with no obvious support for secession from the international community and Madrid's determination to block it, the market reaction may well turn out to be too much too soon.

Investors appear to have overreacted to the political drama and focused too little on the real economic impact.

Turn to North Korea and the market reaction has been just as puzzling in the opposite direction. When you consider the worst-case scenario, investors' response to Kim Jong-Un's sabre-rattling looks complacent.

Indeed, the market most obviously at risk from an escalation of the Kim/Trump stand-off has seemingly welcomed the crisis. The Kospi index in Seoul stands 20 per cent higher than a year ago and it has been positively correlated to the intensification of Kim's nuclear rhetoric. The more missiles he has fired, the higher the Kospi has risen.

Actually, this makes more sense than might appear. Again, it is about probabilities. The market has taken the view, probably rightly, that a nuclear conflagration is unlikely. More likely is that this turns out to be a storm in a teacup. The crisis will pass and South Korea will be seen again as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the ongoing uptick in global economic activity.

Which leaves Trump, and specifically his proposed tax reforms. From a market perspective, this has been the most important political influence in recent weeks, driving Wall Street to a record-breaking run of new record highs. Like the Catalonia situation, this looks to be an overreaction, this time a positive one.

The market has latched onto the White House's tax reform proposals, seeing them as the key to restarting the stalled Trump Trade that galvanised Wall Street in the wake of the Presidential election last year.

In doing so it seems to have fallen into the trap of wishful thinking. Hoping that something will happen is a poor substitute for a careful analysis of whether it is likely to. Rather, this looks like an ex-post rationalisation of a late-cycle market rally. Shares are going up; how can we explain this?

So, the short answer to my opening question is that politics does matter to investors but in unpredictable and often contradictory ways. Investors over- and underreact to political developments.

The economic impact is more important than the political headline but this is often hard to fathom at the time and may change subsequently (as with the fading of the post-Brexit honeymoon period).

What is clear, however, is that for the alert investor, politically-driven sentiment shifts can create great investment opportunities.

More from Morningstar

• Gold returns to favour as risks rise

• ETFs: haters gonna hate

• Make better investment decisions with Morningstar Premium | Free 4-week trial


Tom Stevenson is an investment director at Fidelity International. This is a financial news article to be used for non-commercial purposes and is not intended to provide financial advice of any kind. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to the opinions or recommendations of Morningstar as a result of using different assumptions and criteria.

© 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This information is to be used for personal, non-commercial purposes only. No reproduction is permitted without the prior written consent of Morningstar. Any general advice or 'class service' have been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), or its Authorised Representatives, and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782 ("ASXO"). The article is current as at date of publication.

Email To Friend