SMSFs continue to thrive despite Division 296 tax implications
New data reveals SMSFs could shoulder an even larger tax burden than expected.
A new report on SMSFs indicates the Division 296 tax will have far greater tax implications than expected.
When the tax was first announced in 2023, Treasury predicted that the tax would generate $2.3 billion in its first year.
However, SMSF administration software provider Class’ 2025 Annual Benchmark Report suggests that this may be a lowball figure.
The report finds that if Division 296 had been enacted in the 2024 financial year, Class members would have received a total tax bill of $941 million. About 18,200 Class members would have been impacted, with an average tax liability of $51,702.
Given Class administers about 35% of SMSF assets, extrapolating those figures indicates that SMSFs alone would have had a tax burden of $2.7 billion. That’s $400,000 more than Treasury’s estimate from the entire super sector.
And, if you assume SMSF values grew by 10% in the 2025 financial year, the tax raised from SMSFs alone would rise to $3 billion.
Some SMSFs don’t have the liquidity to pay the tax
The report estimates that 6.7% of affected Class SMSFs have insufficient liquid assets to pay the Div 296 tax.
That’s because more than one in three SMSFs hold direct property, making the tax particularly problematic given the illiquid nature of these assets.
A lot of the SMSF holdings in property are in commercial real estate rather than residential real estate. The former accounts for 12% of total SMSF assets, while the latter is just 5%.
The report says the potential liquidity issues are worrying given that without indexation of the $3 million cap, more SMSFs are likely to be captured over time and liabilities will rise.
SMSFs continuing to thrive
If the intent of Division 296 was to drive people out of SMSFs, it clearly isn’t working.
The report indicates the number of SMSFs grew at their fastest pace in eight years in the year to June 30. The total balance in SMSFs rose to $1.05 trillion and the average member size of an SMSF increased to $1.9 million.
About 42,000 SMSFs were established last financial year, up from 33,000 the year prior. Net new establishments were 17,886 in FY24, an increase of 5.4% on the year before.
The growth in new SMSFs principally came from people aged 45 to 59 (49%), followed by those aged 30 to 44 (37%).
Popular shares, managed funds and LICs in SMSFs
Some of the more intriguing data from the report comes from the asset allocation of SMSFs.
Listed Australian shares remain the most popular asset, accounting for around 27% of SMSF assets, following by direct property at 21%.
Direct property saw a slight decrease in the year to June, likely because of people preparing for the Division 296 tax.
Cash and term deposits saw a second year of declining exposure from SMSFs.
Managed funds picked up some of that money, as did ETFs.
Meanwhile, direct international-listed stocks remain a small percentage of assets in SMSFs. Even if some of that exposure is through ETFs, it remains a tiny proportion.
Of equity exposure, BHP is the most popular stock, with 49% of SMSFs holding it, followed by Woodside at 42% and Westpac at 37%.
In terms of the weights of individual stocks in domestic equities allocations, SMSFs are generally underweight most of the leading stocks. For instance, they have an 8% exposure to CBA, compared to the 10.6% weighting of the stock in the ASX 200 index. From this, it seems that SMSFs have greater exposure to ASX stocks outside of the top 20.
Of direct international share holdings, technology stocks account for 77% of the top 20 international shares by market value. Microsoft is the most popular international share followed by Alphabet. From the data, it appears SMSFs like international tech exposure, albeit it remains small versus their domestic stock holdings.
Of managed funds, income funds such as Janus Henderson’s Tactical Income Fund and the Bentham Global Income Fund remain popular. SMSFs also seem to be looking for more exposure to private assets, through vehicles such as the Partners Group Global Value strategy.
When it comes to ETFs, Vanguard, iShares, and VanEck occupy the top five holdings for domestic and international ETFs.
Finally, of listed investment companies, AFIC, ARGO and Wilson Asset Management are most popular with SMSFs.
If you would like to join the conversation and provide your opinion about the contents of this article, you can leave you comment on the original article on Firstlinks.
