Learn To Invest
Stocks Special Reports LICs Credit Funds ETFs Tools SMSFs
Video Archive Article Archive
News Stocks Special Reports Funds ETFs Features SMSFs Learn


Brexit poses a risk for capital buffers

Francesco Guarascio  |  04 Oct 2017Text size  Decrease  Increase  |  
Email to Friend

Page 1 of 1

BRUSSELS - [Reuters] Banks in the European Union have been told they may face large capital gaps if the bloc and Britain do not agree on how to treat their loss-absorbing debt after Brexit, EU banking watchdogs say.

Under new banking rules meant to reduce taxpayers' costs in banking crisis, EU lenders are required to issue a sufficient amount of debt that would be written down, or bailed-in, to absorb losses if they fail.

The European Banking Authority has estimated that 276 billion euros ($326 billion) of debt will have to be issued by banks in the EU to meet the regulatory targets, warning that markets may find it difficult to absorb it.

Brexit may make things more complicated.

Most banks in the EU have issued loss-absorbing capital under British law, which could make it not compliant with EU rules on bank rescues in the event of a hard Brexit, EBA chief, Andrea Enria, told a banking conference in Brussels.

"What will happen to these instruments if the UK becomes a third country? Banks need to start thinking about that and authorities need to prepare," Enria said.

"We started to alert banks," over these possible risks, Elke Koenig, who chairs the EU agency in charge of failing banks, the Single Resolution Board, told a news conference on Friday.

Regulators face this problem for all bank debt issued under foreign jurisdictions that, in the absence of mutual recognition agreements, may not allow it to be wiped out to rescue a bank.

With Brexit the headache would be exponentially bigger because a large part of EU banks' debt is currently issued under British law.

Part of this debt, known as MREL, is short-term and will be paid back before Britain leaves the bloc in 2019, but the longer-term liabilities are likely to remain pending after Brexit, Enria told Reuters on the sidelines of the conference.

Without a deal on how to treat them, banks may not be able to use them to absorb losses and would in turn be obliged to issue new MREL debt.

Enria said that contractual clauses may need to be inserted into debt contracts to address this uncertainty. "Or banks should rather issue (debt) under different law," he said.


© [2017] Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and the Kinesis logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.
Licensee acknowledges and agrees that text or Multimedia from Thomson Reuters are for the personal, non-commercial use of Users and not otherwise for copying, archiving, storing, republication, re-distribution, re-dissemination, publication or any other commercial exploitation in any form or by any method whatsoever by Licensee, Users, or any other persons. Thomson Reuters will not be held liable in any way to the User or to any third party or to any person who may receive information in Service to any person whatsoever, for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing or occasioned thereby.

Email To Friend