James Hardie (ASX: JHX) shares are down by about half since this time a year ago. Two major events have contributed: the acquisition of Azek in July 2025, the largest in its history, and weak earnings guidance for fiscal 2026.

Why it matters: Following the integration of Azek, we take a fresh look at James Hardie’s Capital Allocation Rating, and now rate it Standard, down from Exemplary previously.

  • Our view of Azek is unchanged. We think the deal is value-destructive, with James Hardie paying a high price for a weaker business than its existing operations. As a result, we now have a more tempered view of management’s investment efficacy.
  • Additionally, we now believe James Hardie sales are more cyclical, with Azek’s products in outdoor decking and accessories more discretionary.

The bottom line: We cut our fair value estimate by 5% to $42 for wide-moat James Hardie. About half of the downgrade is due to trimmed volume expectations from fiscal 2028, as we now view our previous recovery growth assumption as too optimistic. The remainder of the downgrade is on a weaker US dollar, its reporting currency.

  • We continue to expect a recovery in sales volumes from fiscal 2028, in line with anticipated reductions in interest rates leading to increased home improvement activity—albeit less than previously, as we now expect less pent-up demand, particularly for the Azek part of Hardie’s range.
  • Shares trade at around a 35% discount to fair value. We think the market is more pessimistic about cross-selling and cost-saving opportunities arising from the Azek acquisition, as well as expecting lower near-term earnings than us.

Big picture: Also captured in our updated Capital Allocation Rating is management’s poor treatment of holders of the Australian Securities Exchange-listed shares. In our view, refusing to seek Australian shareholders’ approval for the Azek acquisition destroyed trust and confidence in management’s capital allocation decisions.

Business strategy and outlook

James Hardie’s growth strategy includes marketing directly to homeowners, market share growth, and category expansion. We view this as rational and achievable, given past success. We estimate Hardie has about 90% market share in the fiber cement category in its main geography of North America, which contributes about 80% of group operating income. About two-thirds of North American EBIT is from repair and renovation, or R&R, and the remainder is from new house construction. We view the R&R market as less cyclical, with homes needing to be re-sided approximately every 40 years. According to the US Census Bureau, about half of all houses are 40 years or older. As such, we expect a steady pipeline of homes requiring siding replacement or repairs through the next decade.

A focus on marketing directly to homeowners sees James Hardie promote demand for its fiber cement-based products emphasizing product value, durability, and design. The strategy to increase penetration and grow market share involves taking share from competing siding products seen as less durable or higher maintenance. Indeed, over the five years to 2022, the Census Bureau reports that fiber cement siding on newly built houses gained 3% market share in the US compared with vinyl (down 2%), stucco (up 2%), brick (down 2%), and wood (down 1%). Fiber cement siding was the siding of choice in 23% of all new US house completions in 2022. We estimate that James Hardie fiber cement siding is on about 7% of existing US houses.

Another growth initiative is targeted architectural products to appeal to higher-end markets, penetrate regions with different housing styles, and compete with costlier siding materials such as stucco and brick. This involves leveraging research and development into new products to better fit markets and/or improve margins. The firm’s primary R&R market is the US Northeast and Midwest, where the climate and house framing style suit traditional overlap siding, but newer products are targeted at other regions, such as a stucco-look product that competes in the predominantly stucco-clad Southwest.

Capital allocation rating

While James Hardie’s balance sheet is weak, it is likely to improve. We consider shareholder distributions are appropriate, but we take a cautious view of recent and future investments. Overall, we think a Standard rating is appropriate.

Allocation of capital to its competitively advantaged North American and Asia-Pacific operations is sensible to drive long-term organic growth. Historically, capital allocation has been mostly organic, with multiple capacity expansion projects underway in the US and the Asia-Pacific. But this changed with the acquisition of Azek in North America, the largest in its history, in early fiscal 2026. We think this purchase is likely value-destructive. Its products are less differentiated than Hardie’s and the industry more competitive. We do not ascribe the full cost and sales benefits that management expects from the acquisition.

An additional risk is that investing in fiber cement capacity in Europe could destroy value. Given the relatively small size of the European segment, the impact of a proportionate investment in the region is likely to be modest. After two decades in Europe, sales in the firm’s fiber cement product remain low, and most of this segment’s earnings are from internal fiber gypsum cladding. European houses are more commonly masonry style, as opposed to framed, reducing demand for fiber cement. Additionally, Europe operations have low operating margins—about 9% in fiscal 2024—which we attribute to sales mostly being from the commoditylike fiber gypsum interior boards. There are several domestic and international players in the Europe fiber gypsum category, resulting in lower prices and restricting margin expansion.

James Hardie’s balance sheet risk is estimated to be temporarily elevated, with net debt/adjusted EBITDA peaking at 4.0 times at the end of fiscal 2026. However, we expect a return to below management’s target of 2.0 times within three years of the Azek merger, and a net cash position by the end of the decade.

Distributions to shareholders are appropriate. James Hardie’s decision in fiscal 2023 to deploy excess capital to shareholders via share buybacks rather than dividends provides flexibility to prioritize growth through the cycle. An ongoing buyback program appropriately balances ongoing reinvestment requirements with shareholder distributions.

Bulls say

  • James Hardie’s US segment continues to take market share from lower-cost alternative siding materials, such as vinyl and wood, despite higher prices and a downturn in residential spending.
  • Economic cycles aside, James Hardie’s wide economic moat provides a strong defense for long-term earnings and returns.
  • About one-fourth of all new house builds in the US use fiber cement siding, supporting the firm’s future repair and renovation pipeline as these homes will eventually need re-siding or repairs.

Bears say

  • High interest rates are likely to damp demand for new housing.
  • US homebuyers could continue a shift toward multifamily units rather than single family, causing fiber cement siding demand to decline.
  • Despite two decades in the region, uptake of fiber cement in Europe has been slow and meeting midterm financial targets in this segment seems unlikely.

Get Morningstar insights in your inbox

Terms used in this article

Star Rating: Our one- to five-star ratings are guideposts to a broad audience and individuals must consider their own specific investment goals, risk tolerance, and several other factors. A five-star rating means our analysts think the current market price likely represents an excessively pessimistic outlook and that beyond fair risk-adjusted returns are likely over a long timeframe. A one-star rating means our analysts think the market is pricing in an excessively optimistic outlook, limiting upside potential and leaving the investor exposed to capital loss.

Fair Value: Morningstar’s Fair Value estimate results from a detailed projection of a company’s future cash flows, resulting from our analysts’ independent primary research. Price To Fair Value measures the current market price against estimated Fair Value. If a company’s stock trades at $100 and our analysts believe it is worth $200, the price to fair value ratio would be 0.5. A Price to Fair Value over 1 suggests the share is overvalued.

Moat Rating: An economic moat is a structural feature that allows a firm to sustain excess profits over a long period. Companies with a narrow moat are those we believe are more likely than not to sustain excess returns for at least a decade. For wide-moat companies, we have high confidence that excess returns will persist for 10 years and are likely to persist at least 20 years. To learn about finding different sources of moat, read this article by Mark LaMonica.