Where in the world to find value right now
Why Antipodes founder and CIO Jacob Mitchell likes companies involved in the energy transition, but is steering clear of Australian banks.
Antipodes founder and chief investment officer Jacob Mitchell is seeing opportunities for companies involved in the energy transition, emerging markets and the US.
But investors should 'definitely avoid' the Australian banks in the current environment, he warns, given a "lack of any margin of safety" and almost the "highest ever relative valuations versus global banks".
Should investors be cautious of global markets in the current environment?
Jacob Mitchell: Cautious? Yeah, I think relative to the top down, yes, in areas of the market where you don't see the recession or tougher consumer environment is priced in, we are cautious. And then the liquidity environment is a second issue, like even if we resolve the debt ceiling, the Treasury has to rebuild its cash position and the Feds doing QT.
There's always a delay when you lift interest rates and that transmission in the U.S. is longer, than it is in other western economies because mortgages are fixed rate. So the shocks happen in the banking system because the banking system can't pass on the rate rises, as fast as they they do in other parts of the world.
So we've seen, the stage 1 of the banking system starting to have its issues. I think stage 2 is that translates to the economy and unemployment starts to go up and generally that's not priced in, the market multiple being roughly 20 times, we don't think that's priced in. And that's happening against this backdrop of real tightening in liquidity. The Fed and the Treasury is sucking cash out of the system, and that's not generally great for asset prices.
Why do you think investors should avoid Australian banks?
JM: Yeah, it really comes down to the lack of any margin of safety in Australian banks. I mean, they're almost at their highest ever relative valuations versus global banks.
The starting position is that they're very well, their capital positions are sound, et cetera. Well, the only reason their capital position is sound is because the risk weights on mortgages here are very low. And if you look at total loans to equity, they're actually at the low end from a capital position perspective.
There's two things that are going to impact, which we don't think is priced in.
Number one, the lack of affordability just means there's no demand for housing loans. So you got a shrinking pool of demand and all the players are being, arguably behaving, the oligopoly is slowly breaking down. So they're being much more aggressive in their competition for the new, you know, for the incremental loans. And we don't think there's an easy way to fix that? I mean, the only way to fix the affordability issue is by the cut rates, but we still have this sticky inflationary environment or housing prices have to fall. And we know housing prices are pretty stable because of this shortage. So it's really hard to resolve which is actually bad, right?
These banks aren't going to grow. And if we do have a real downside scenario where unemployment starts to go up because the RBA gets forced to tighten too much, that's when you start to worry about the capital position. So no margin of safety, we think multiple ways of losing. So, they're definitely avoids.
Where in the world are you seeing opportunities at the moment?
JM: The big one is the energy transition, and there's a lot of policy -- we think it's a policy supported super cycle investment in like principally electricity or electrical infrastructure. And I think companies like Siemens Energy (SMNEY), which is almost a one stop shop for that transition. So that's one area I think is really interesting.
Broadly speaking, equities outside the US are lot cheaper. The multiple which is roughly 13 times versus close to 20 times in the US, so at 13 times you're actually pricing in arguably a pretty bad macro environment anyway.
And in Europe, we're very overweight, but predominantly through companies like Siemens Energy multinationals that are well positioned.
And then in the emerging markets, I think it's really interesting point in the cycle for emerging markets generally because they actually have been far better behaved than western policymakers in the last couple of cycles. So we think they can start performing even without the Fed moving into a cutting cycle. And whether it's China or Indonesia, but something as simple as Alibaba (BABA) which it's gone through, everyone knows, it's had regulatory issues. But those regulatory cycles, they do tend to come in cycles and we think they're on the right side of that cycle and on a core e-commerce multiple of around 6 times, it's pretty cheap. The business doesn't really need to grow, it just doesn't need to shrink that much to justify that type of multiple and we think it's still a very dominant platform, so can protect its position.