Microsoft’s (NAS: MSFT) second-quarter results topped the high end of guidance. Revenue increased 15% year over year in constant currency to $81.3 billion, compared with the high end of guidance of $80.6 billion. The operating margin was 47.1%, compared with the high end of guidance at 45.8%.

Why it matters: Results look good as headline numbers came in ahead of our expectations on both the top and bottom lines. Both PBP and IC came in nicely ahead of the top end of guidance. Critically, we see strength in Azure, in both traditional and artificial intelligence workloads.

  • Near-term demand indicators are robust. Commercial bookings grew 228% year over year in constant currency, driven by large Azure deals, including the previously announced $250 billion OpenAI commitment. RPO was up 110% (up 28% without OpenAI) to $625 billion.
  • Demand for Azure AI services is surging, which is clearly a long-term positive. While Azure remains capacity-constrained, both traditional and AI workloads were strong. Azure growth was 38% in constant currency for the quarter and exceeded guidance of 37%, versus 89% growth in capital expenditure.

The bottom line: We maintain our fair value estimate for wide-moat Microsoft at $600 per share. We tweaked our model over the medium term, primarily to reflect slightly faster Azure growth and slightly lower margins to account for elevated capex. The stock remains one of our top picks.

Coming up: Third-quarter guidance is largely in line with expectations, although it is officially slightly better than our model and just shy of FactSet consensus estimates, including $81.20 billion in revenue, a 45.3% operating margin, and $3.94 in EPS at the midpoints.

Big picture: We see results as consistent with our long-term thesis, which centers on the expansion of hybrid cloud environments, the proliferation of artificial intelligence, and Azure. We center our growth estimates around Azure, Microsoft 365 E5 migration, and traction with the Power Platform.

Bulls say

  • Public cloud is widely considered to be the future of enterprise computing, and Azure is a leading service that benefits the evolution to first to hybrid environments, and then ultimately to public cloud environments.
  • Microsoft 365 continues to benefit from upselling into higher-priced stock-keeping units as customers are willing to pay up for better security and Teams Phone, which should continue over the next several years.
  • Microsoft has monopoly like positions in various areas (OS, Office) that serve as cash cows to help drive Azure growth.

Bears say

  • Momentum is slowing in the ongoing shift to subscriptions, particularly in Office, which is generally considered a mature product.
  • Microsoft lacks a meaningful mobile presence.
  • Microsoft is not the top player in its key sources of growth, notably Azure and Dynamics.

Get Morningstar insights in your inbox

Terms used in this article

Star Rating: Our one- to five-star ratings are guideposts to a broad audience and individuals must consider their own specific investment goals, risk tolerance, and several other factors. A five-star rating means our analysts think the current market price likely represents an excessively pessimistic outlook and that beyond fair risk-adjusted returns are likely over a long timeframe. A one-star rating means our analysts think the market is pricing in an excessively optimistic outlook, limiting upside potential and leaving the investor exposed to capital loss.

Fair Value: Morningstar’s Fair Value estimate results from a detailed projection of a company’s future cash flows, resulting from our analysts’ independent primary research. Price To Fair Value measures the current market price against estimated Fair Value. If a company’s stock trades at $100 and our analysts believe it is worth $200, the price to fair value ratio would be 0.5. A Price to Fair Value over 1 suggests the share is overvalued.

Moat Rating: An economic moat is a structural feature that allows a firm to sustain excess profits over a long period. Companies with a narrow moat are those we believe are more likely than not to sustain excess returns for at least a decade. For wide-moat companies, we have high confidence that excess returns will persist for 10 years and are likely to persist at least 20 years. To learn about finding different sources of moat, read this article by Mark LaMonica.