Morningstar Investor users sign in here.

Video

Greenwashing explained

Morningstar's Hortense Bioy on how to spot greenwashing and how to avoid it.


Hortense Bioy: In the context of investing, greenwashing is making un-substantiated or misleading claims about the sustainability characteristics and benefits of an investment product. 

Greenwashing comes in a variety of shades and intentions, and I think it’s worth distinguishing between two types of greenwashing:

There is intentional greenwashing, which is when asset managers over-claim and over-sell what they’re actually providing. And this type of greenwashing is clearly problematic, and corrosive to long-term trust and credibility.

And there is another form of greenwashing that often comes down to an expectations gap between investors and asset managers. So, here, there is no real intention from the asset manager to over-state the green characteristics of a product, but the investor expects more—because there is no common definition of “green”, the investor has a certain idea of what green should look like—without realising sometimes that it is not practical or in his best interest.

Now, both types of greenwashing can be largely addressed through disclosure and investor education. Asset managers need to be upfront about what’s green or sustainable about their products and report on the ESG characteristics of their products. Companies must do the same and also be transparent about their business practices. 

At the investor-level, greenwashing is a problem because the investor could be disappointed or feel cheated—because they have their own idea of what green is, and when they look at their portfolios and the actual holdings, they see companies that that they didn’t expect to see, for example fossil fuel companies.

Greenwashing is also a problem for the planet and society if money is not flowing into activities that are necessary to solve environmental issues like climate change, and social issues, like rising inequalities, for example.

To spot greenwashing and avoid it, due diligence is key. First, an investor needs to look beyond a fund’s name or label and understand what the fund’s objective is: What does the fund aim to do? Is it a fund that aims to invest in companies with lower ESG risk? Does it aim to invest in companies that offer solutions to the world’s biggest challenges? Does the fund claim to have some sort of impact?

Then, the fund’s claims need to be tested. An investor needs to look under the hood, look at the fund’s holdings and their ESG characteristics. Many funds with a climate theme don’t actually invest only in green companies. They may invest in so-called “transition” companies. These are companies that today don’t necessarily have good green credentials, they may even have exposure to fossil fuels, but these companies have the intention and plans to improve their environmental profile. An investor must feel comfortable with this type of companies. 

Morningstar and other organisations provide ESG metrics and ratings that enable investors to assess the sustainability profile of investment products. The key is to find the right data points. Often, an investor will have to use a combination of metrics to get the complete picture, and make sure the investment aligns with his sustainability or green preferences and his financial objectives.



© 2023 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Morningstar, its affiliates, nor the content providers guarantee the data or content contained herein to be accurate, complete or timely nor will they have any liability for its use or distribution. This report has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or New Zealand wholesale clients of Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc. Any general advice has been provided without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Our publications, ratings and products should be viewed as an additional investment resource, not as your sole source of information. Morningstar’s full research reports are the source of any Morningstar Ratings and are available from Morningstar or your adviser. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a financial adviser. Some material is copyright and published under licence from ASX Operations Pty Ltd ACN 004 523 782.

More from Morningstar

Bank results: the winners and losers
Video

Bank results: the winners and losers

Morningstar analyst Nathan Zaia explains how the banks did and what the future holds.
How to deal with financial stress
Video

How to deal with financial stress

More high-income earners are now also experiencing financial stress. We go through practical ways to reduce it
UniSuper CIO John Pearce on why the 60/40 portfolio is far from dead
Video

UniSuper CIO John Pearce on why the 60/40 portfolio is far from dead

The $130 Billion SuperFund Manager also talks about how he sees risk, his recent investments, and why history isn’t a good guide to the future.
Incitec Pivot: explosive upside ahead?
Video

Incitec Pivot: explosive upside ahead?

Morningstar analyst Mark Taylor believes imminent growth in explosives earnings could lift sentiment.
Why Morningstar see opportunities in coal stocks
Video

Why Morningstar see opportunities in coal stocks

Analyst Jon Mills explains why he’s recently increased fair value estimates for Australian coal companies.
Is the sharp fall in ResMed's share price justified?
Video

Is the sharp fall in ResMed's share price justified?

The potential for weight loss drugs to impact the sleep apnea giant has weighed on the share price, though Morningstar analyst Shane Ponraj thinks...